Loading…

Separability of sea ice types from wide swath C- and L-band synthetic aperture radar imagery acquired during the melt season

Differentiating between first-year ice (FYI) and multi-year ice (MYI) in C-band synthetic aperture radar (SAR) imagery during spring–summer melt, when wet snow and melt ponds mask the underlying ice, is difficult. It has been suggested that the use of L-band SAR may alleviate this concern given incr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Remote sensing of environment 2016-03, Vol.174, p.314-328
Main Authors: Casey, J. Alec, Howell, Stephen E.L., Tivy, Adrienne, Haas, Christian
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Differentiating between first-year ice (FYI) and multi-year ice (MYI) in C-band synthetic aperture radar (SAR) imagery during spring–summer melt, when wet snow and melt ponds mask the underlying ice, is difficult. It has been suggested that the use of L-band SAR may alleviate this concern given increased penetration depths at longer wavelengths; however, this has not been thoroughly assessed. Here the separability of FYI and MYI is compared using horizontally polarized (HH) C-band (RADARSAT-2) and L-band (ALOS/PALSAR) ScanSAR images acquired over landfast sea ice in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago in the spring and summer of 2009. L-band provided enhanced contrast between FYI and MYI during early melt onset and during the drainage phase of advanced melt, while C-band was found to provide enhanced contrast when the wet snowpack was transitioning from the pendular regime to the funicular regime. At the time of the pendular–funicular transition, the backscatter signatures of FYI and MYI reversed at both C- and L-band. This behavior is well established at C-band, but has not been reported previously at L-band. The L-band imagery also provided improved definition of floe boundaries and ridges throughout the melt season. Finally, the L-band data had reduced speckle (equivalent number of looks ~12), relative to the C-band data (~9 equivalent looks). These results indicate that L-band SAR data acquired during the melt season could be used to enhance operational and scientific sea ice information products that have traditionally been derived from single-frequency C-band SAR data. •First assessment of sea ice type separability at L- and C-band during summer melt.•L-band provides improved ice type separability during melt onset and advanced melt.•L-band provides improved information on floe texture and ridge detection.•Speckle is reduced at L-band, relative to C-band.•L-band provides new and complementary sea ice information during melt.
ISSN:0034-4257
1879-0704
DOI:10.1016/j.rse.2015.12.021