Lower Total Knee Arthroplasty Revision Risk Associated With Bisphosphonate Use, Even in Patients With Normal Bone Density

• Published in: The Journal of arthroplasty 2016-02, Vol.31 (2), p.537-541
• Main Authors: Namba, Robert S., MD, Inacio, Maria C.S., PhD, Cheetham, T. Craig, PharmD, Dell, Richard M., MD, Paxton, Elizabeth W., MA, Khatod, Monti X., MD
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - adverse effects; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - statistics & numerical data; bisphosphonates; Bone and Bones - surgery; Bone Density; Bone Density Conservation Agents - adverse effects; Diphosphonates - adverse effects; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Orthopedics; Periprosthetic Fractures - chemically induced; Reoperation - statistics & numerical data; revision; Risk Factors; total knee
• ISSN: 0883-5403; 1532-8406
• DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.09.005

Abstract Background Bisphosphonates (BPs) are associated with lower total knee arthroplasty (TKA) revision risk, but the effect of bone mineral density has not been evaluated. Methods A cohort of 34,116 primary TKA patients was evaluated with revision surgery and periprosthetic fractures as end points. BP usage was the exposure of interest. Bone quality (normal, osteopenia, and osteoporosis) and patient age (< 65 vs ≥ 65 years) were evaluated as effect modifiers of risk estimates. Results Of the patients, 19.6% were BP users. In BP users, 0.5% underwent an aseptic revision; and 0.6%, a periprosthetic fracture. In non-BP users, 1.6% underwent aseptic revision; and 0.1%, a periprosthetic fracture. Conclusion Bisphosphonate use was associated with lower risk of revision in all bone quality categories in those older than 65 years. The risk of periprosthetic fractures was higher for patients on BP.