Loading…

Multi-criteria land suitability analysis for agriculture in hilly zone: Remote sensing and GIS approach

•Fine resolution IRS P6 LISS-IV satellite datasets are useful for LSA.•MCE and AHP techniques are useful to detect suitable lands for agriculture.•Ranks of criterion are based on experts’ opinion and correlation analysis.•Assigned scores of sub-criterion are based on literature survey and field work...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Computers and electronics in agriculture 2015-10, Vol.118, p.300-321
Main Authors: Zolekar, Rajendra Bhausaheb, Bhagat, Vijay Shivaji
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•Fine resolution IRS P6 LISS-IV satellite datasets are useful for LSA.•MCE and AHP techniques are useful to detect suitable lands for agriculture.•Ranks of criterion are based on experts’ opinion and correlation analysis.•Assigned scores of sub-criterion are based on literature survey and field work.•Reviewed lands are highly, moderately, marginally and not suitable for agriculture. Physiographic components play a fundamental role in agriculture in hilly zone. Slope, soil depth, erosion, moisture, water holding capacities, texture and availability of nutrients have affect on agricultural production. Land suitability analysis can help to formulate the strategies for improvement in agricultural productivity. GIS based multi-criterion decision making approach using IRS P6 LISS-IV dataset was used to analyze land suitability for agriculture in hilly zone. The experts’ opinions and correlation analyses were used to decide the ranks of influencing criterion whereas pairwise comparison matrix in ‘Comparison for Super Decision Software’ used to determine the weights. The scores for sub-parameters showing internal variations within the criteria assigned based on field work and reported norms in published literature. About 17% (7326ha) of reviewed area are classified in the class ‘highly suitable’, 29% (12,372ha) in ‘moderately suitable’, 16% (6514ha) in ‘marginally suitable’ and 38% (15,798ha) in ‘not suitable’ for agriculture. The land suitability classes i.e. ‘highly suitable’ and ‘not suitable’ in suitability map are precisely estimated than the classes ‘moderately suitable’ and ‘marginally suitable’ both in producer’s and user’s point of view. The methodology, techniques and findings of the study can be useful to assess the land suitability for agriculture in hilly zones.
ISSN:0168-1699
1872-7107
DOI:10.1016/j.compag.2015.09.016