Loading…

Long-term oncological outcomes of an active surveillance program in recurrent low grade Ta bladder cancer

Abstract Introduction Over the last 2 decades, there has been a major increase in active surveillance (AS) as a therapeutic alternative in urological tumors regarded to be of low risk. Owing to the findings of significant clinical outcomes in our series, this report presents an update of our AS prog...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Urologic oncology 2016-04, Vol.34 (4), p.165.e19-165.e23
Main Authors: Hernández, Virginia, M.D, Llorente, Carlos, M.D., Ph.D, de la Peña, Enrique, M.D., Ph.D, Pérez-Fernández, Elia, M.D., Ph.D, Guijarro, Ana, M.D, Sola, Ignacio, M.D
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Introduction Over the last 2 decades, there has been a major increase in active surveillance (AS) as a therapeutic alternative in urological tumors regarded to be of low risk. Owing to the findings of significant clinical outcomes in our series, this report presents an update of our AS program in patients with recurrent non−muscle-invasive bladder tumor. The objective was to confirm the oncological long-term safety of this protocol and to determine possible variables associated with progression. Materials and methods Cohort of patients included in AS between 1999 and 2014. Inclusion criteria : recurrent papillary tumors, previous pTa-pT1, G1-G2, shorter than 1 cm, and fewer than 5 tumour sites. Exclusion criteria : prior G3, CIS (carcinoma in situ), or positive-result cytology. All patients underwent close monitoring with flexible cystoscopy every 3 to 4 months for the first 2 years. After this time, follow-ups were conducted every 6 months, alternating between cystoscopy and ultrasound. Urinary cytology test was performed at all visits. Results In all, 252 AS periods in 186 patients were studied, with a median follow-up of 6 years. Out of all periods, 203 (80.6%) underwent active treatment. After remaining under observation, 86.4% had not progressed in stage, and 79.3% in grade. Of these patients, 4 experienced progression to T2; all of them were previously T1G2. Conclusions AS in a high-selectivity group of patients with recurrent non−muscle-invasive bladder tumor is feasible and oncologically safe in the long term. Patients with previous history of T1 should not be included in AS protocols even when very small recurrences are diagnosed.
ISSN:1078-1439
1873-2496
DOI:10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.11.005