Loading…
Changes in volume of giant intracranial aneurysms treated by surgical strategies other than direct clipping
Background Giant intracranial aneurysms (GIA) are often not eligible for direct clip occlusion. Surgical alternatives include partial clip occlusion or the placement of a cerebrovascular bypass or the combination of both. These alternative indirect strategies are expected to lead to a decrease in GI...
Saved in:
Published in: | Acta neurochirurgica 2015-07, Vol.157 (7), p.1117-1123 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background
Giant intracranial aneurysms (GIA) are often not eligible for direct clip occlusion. Surgical alternatives include partial clip occlusion or the placement of a cerebrovascular bypass or the combination of both. These alternative indirect strategies are expected to lead to a decrease in GIA volume over time rather than instantaneously. To examine whether this is the case, we analyzed follow-up imaging results 1 year after surgery.
Methods
We retrospectively screened the prospective GIA Registry’s imaging database for anterior circulation GIA treated by surgical strategies other than direct clipping. We measured pre- and 1-year post-treatment GIA volume, lateral ventricle volume (LVV), and mid-line shift (MLS) in 19 cases.
Results
After a mean follow-up of 466 days (standard deviation ±171) GIA volumes decreased from 9.6 cm
3
(interquartile range (IQR) 6.1–14.1) to 4.3 cm
3
(IQR 2.9–5.7;
p
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 0001-6268 0942-0940 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00701-015-2448-y |