Substrate elasticity regulates the behavior of human monocyte-derived macrophages

• Published in: European biophysics journal 2016-05, Vol.45 (4), p.301-309
• Main Authors: Adlerz, Katrina M., Aranda-Espinoza, Helim, Hayenga, Heather N.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Atherosclerosis; Biochemistry; Biological and Medical Physics; Biomechanical Phenomena; Biomechanics; Biomedical and Life Sciences; Biophysics; Cell adhesion & migration; Cell Biology; Cell growth; Cell Movement; Cell Proliferation; Cytoskeleton - metabolism; Elasticity; Humans; Life Sciences; Macrophages - cytology; Medical equipment; Membrane Biology; Monocytes - cytology; Nanotechnology; Neurobiology; Original Article; Phagocytosis; Substrates
• ISSN: 0175-7571; 1432-1017
• DOI: 10.1007/s00249-015-1096-8

Macrophages play a key role in atherosclerosis, cancer, and in the response to implanted medical devices. In each of these situations, the mechanical environment of a macrophage can vary from soft to stiff. However, how stiffness affects macrophage behavior remains uncertain. Using substrates of varying stiffness, we show macrophage phenotype and function depends on substrate stiffness. Notably, the cell area increases slightly from a sphere after 18 h on substrates mimicking healthy arterial stiffness (1–5 kPa), whereas macrophages on stiffer substrates (280 kPa–70 GPa) increased in area by nearly eight-fold. Macrophage migration is random regardless of substrate stiffness. The total average track speed was 7.8 ± 0.5 μm/h, with macrophages traveling fastest on the 280-kPa substrate (12.0 ± 0.5 μm/h) and slowest on the 3-kPa substrate (5.0 ± 0.4 μm/h). In addition F-actin organization in macrophages depends on substrate stiffness. On soft substrates, F-actin is spread uniformly throughout the cytoplasm, whereas on stiff substrates F-actin is functionalized into stress fibers. The proliferation rate of macrophages was faster on stiff substrates. Cells plated on the 280-kPa gel had a significantly shorter doubling time than those plated on the softer substrate. However, the ability of macrophages to phagocytose 1-μm particles did not depend on substrate stiffness. In conclusion, the results herein show macrophages are mechanosensitive; they respond to changes in stiffness by modifying their area, migration speed, actin organization, and proliferation rate. These results are important to understanding how macrophages respond in complex mechanical environments such as an atherosclerotic plaque.