Loading…

Epidemiology of capsular and surface polysaccharide in Staphylococcus aureus infections complicated by bacteraemia

Staphylococcus aureus is a leading cause of serious hospital- and community-acquired infections. The discovery of serologically distinct capsular polysaccharides on the surface of clinical isolates has allowed the development of vaccines and passive protective immunity. We have studied patient chara...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of hospital infection 2005, Vol.59 (1), p.27-32
Main Authors: Roghmann, M., Taylor, K.L., Gupte, A., Zhan, M., Johnson, J.A., Cross, A., Edelman, R., Fattom, A.I.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Staphylococcus aureus is a leading cause of serious hospital- and community-acquired infections. The discovery of serologically distinct capsular polysaccharides on the surface of clinical isolates has allowed the development of vaccines and passive protective immunity. We have studied patient characteristics, infection characteristics and the surface and capsular polysaccharide serotype distribution in patients with S. aureus infections complicated by bacteraemia admitted to VA hospitals in Maryland between 1995 and 2000. Nine hundred and ninety-three blood cultures from 331 patients were positive for S. aureus. Thirty-eight percent of patients had diabetes, 11% had end-stage renal failure, and 23% were injection drug users. Forty-two percent of infections were caused by methicillin-resistant strains (MRSA), and 60% were acquired during hospitalization. Serotyping of the first available isolate per patient ( N=234 isolates) using polyclonal antibodies showed three major phenotypes—42%, type 8 (T8) capsule; 50%, type 5 (T5) capsule; and 8%, 336 polysaccharide. MRSA isolates were significantly more likely to be T5 than methicillin-susceptible isolates (66% vs. 39%, P
ISSN:0195-6701
1532-2939
DOI:10.1016/j.jhin.2004.07.014