Loading…

Models of Asphalt Concrete Field Compactibility with Focus on Lift Thickness

Compaction of asphalt concrete, quantified by air voids, is a significant performance factor. Although compactibility is affected by numerous factors (e.g., mix temperature), this paper focuses on lift thickness. The pavement industry throughout the years has observed a general trend toward thicker...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Transportation research record 2015-01, Vol.2504 (1), p.135-147
Main Authors: Williams, Kevin L., Cox, Ben C., Howard, Isaac L., Cooley, L. Allen
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Compaction of asphalt concrete, quantified by air voids, is a significant performance factor. Although compactibility is affected by numerous factors (e.g., mix temperature), this paper focuses on lift thickness. The pavement industry throughout the years has observed a general trend toward thicker lifts that generally maintain temperature longer and provide more room for aggregate particle orientation during compaction. The current ratios of lift thickness (t) to nominal maximum aggregate size (NMAS) typically range from three to five. The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of lift thickness on the compactibility of 22 field paving projects (72 test locations) through the use of multiple regression analysis. Two regression models were developed to this end. The findings supported general, but not well-documented, perceptions that a t/NMAS ratio that was too high could adversely affect air void levels. Furthermore, optimal t/NMAS range with respect to air voids may be higher (i.e., four to six times higher) than the three to five times higher range allowed by many state departments of transportation. Consideration should be given to further exploration of greater t/NMAS ratios.
ISSN:0361-1981
2169-4052
DOI:10.3141/2504-16