Loading…

Integrating horizon scanning and strategic risk prioritisation using a weight of evidence framework to inform policy decisions

Poor connection between data on emerging issues and credible policy decisions continues to challenge governments, and is only likely to grow as demands on time and resources increase. Here we summarise recent efforts to integrate horizon scanning and risk prioritisation approaches to better connect...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Science of the total environment 2016-08, Vol.560-561, p.82-91
Main Authors: Garnett, K., Lickorish, F.A., Rocks, S.A., Prpich, G., Rathe, A.A., Pollard, S.J.T.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Poor connection between data on emerging issues and credible policy decisions continues to challenge governments, and is only likely to grow as demands on time and resources increase. Here we summarise recent efforts to integrate horizon scanning and risk prioritisation approaches to better connect emerging issues to the political discourse on environmental and food-related issues. Our categorisation of insights including potential future risks and opportunities to inform policy discussions has emerged from a structured three-year programme of horizon scanning for a UK pan-governmental futures partnership led by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra). Our efforts to integrate horizon scanning and risk prioritisation, utilising a qualitative weight of evidence framework, has created a systematic process for identifying all signals of potential future change with significant impact for the strategic mission and underlying values of policy actors. Our approach encourages an exploration of factors out of the control of organisations, recognising that resilience depends on the flexibility of management strategies and the preparedness to deal with a variety of unexpected outcomes. We discuss how this approach addresses key cultural and evaluative challenges that policy actors have had in embedding horizon scanning in evidence-based policy processes, and suggest further developments to build confidence in the use of horizon scanning for strategic planning. [Display omitted] •Building confidence in use of horizon scanning in evidence-based policy making•Systematic examination of the plausibility of horizon scanning evidence•Risk prioritisation methods used to assess importance of emerging issues•Greater risk based understanding of the uncertainty around emerging issues•Prioritised set of outputs that have clearer links to policy decisions
ISSN:0048-9697
1879-1026
DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.040