Digging in the dirt – Inadequacy of belowground plant biomass quantification

Accurate quantification of belowground plant biomass (BGP) is crucial to account for the carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) stored by plants. As soil sieving to recover roots leaves a large proportion of root borne compounds defined as rhizodeposits (fine roots, root fragments, exudates) unaccounted for, i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Soil biology & biochemistry 2016-05, Vol.96, p.137-144
Main Authors: Hupe, Anke, Schulz, Hannes, Bruns, Christian, Joergensen, Rainer Georg, Wichern, Florian
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
15N
Belowground plant biomass
Mass balance approach
Pea
Pisum sativum
Rhizodeposition
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Accurate quantification of belowground plant biomass (BGP) is crucial to account for the carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) stored by plants. As soil sieving to recover roots leaves a large proportion of root borne compounds defined as rhizodeposits (fine roots, root fragments, exudates) unaccounted for, isotope-labelling approaches have frequently been used. The aim of the present study was to compare two approaches that estimate BGP-N from isotope labelling experiments and assess their potential error. Pisum sativum was grown in a pot experiment and repeatedly pulse labelled with a 13C glucose and 15N urea solution using a cotton wick method. Additionally, data from a previous study using the same labelling approach were used for comparative BGP-N calculations. In both experiments, the amount of BGP-N calculated with a mass balance approach was significantly lower compared with the classical calculation, indicating substantial overestimation of N rhizodeposition in previous studies. Multiple pulse labelling of plants with 15N can result in homogeneous label distribution, which allows both calculation approaches to be used. However, when label distribution is heterogeneous, the classical approach overestimates N rhizodeposition and BGP-N. •We compare two approaches to estimate belowground plant N (BGP-N).•Pea was labelled with a 13C glucose and 15N urea solution.•A mass balance can lead to a lower BGP-N than the classical calculation method.•Homogeneous labelling is required for the classical calculation method.•A mass balance approach is an alternative way for calculating rhizodeposition.
ISSN:0038-0717
1879-3428
DOI:10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.01.014