Loading…
Lazy Multi-label Learning Algorithms Based on Mutuality Strategies
Lazy multi-label learning algorithms have become an important research topic within the multi-label community. These algorithms usually consider the set of standard k -Nearest Neighbors of a new instance to predict its labels (multi-label). The prediction is made by following a voting criteria withi...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of intelligent & robotic systems 2015-12, Vol.80 (Suppl 1), p.261-276 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Lazy multi-label learning algorithms have become an important research topic within the multi-label community. These algorithms usually consider the set of standard
k
-Nearest Neighbors of a new instance to predict its labels (multi-label). The prediction is made by following a voting criteria within the multi-labels of the set of
k
-Nearest Neighbors of the new instance. This work proposes the use of two alternative strategies to identify the set of these examples: the Mutual and Not Mutual Nearest Neighbors rules, which have already been used by lazy single-learning algorithms. In this work, we use these strategies to extend the lazy multi-label algorithm
BRkNN
. An experimental evaluation carried out to compare both mutuality strategies with the original
BRkNN
algorithm and the well-known
MLkNN
lazy algorithm on 15 benchmark datasets showed that
MLkNN
presented the best predictive performance for the
Hamming-Loss
evaluation measure, although it was significantly outperformed by the mutuality strategies when
F-Measure
is considered. The best results of the lazy algorithms were also compared with the results obtained by the Binary Relevance approach using three different base learning algorithms. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0921-0296 1573-0409 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10846-014-0144-4 |