Loading…

Differences in response to simulated herbivory between Quercus crispula and Quercus dentata

To evaluate the responses of Quercus crispula and Quercus dentata to herbivory, their leaves were subjected to simulated herbivory in early spring and examined for the subsequent changes in leaf traits and attacks by chewing herbivores in mid summer. In Quercus crispula, nitrogen content per area wa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecological research 2004-05, Vol.19 (3), p.323-329
Main Authors: HATTORI, Kouhei, ISHIDA, Takahide A., MIKI, Kaori, SUZUKI, Mayuko, KIMURA, Masahito T.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3931-b8fb29f9eef8b4b7aac91373be8a3aab766a6abb28cbd11a16e5be6a2c036f803
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3931-b8fb29f9eef8b4b7aac91373be8a3aab766a6abb28cbd11a16e5be6a2c036f803
container_end_page 329
container_issue 3
container_start_page 323
container_title Ecological research
container_volume 19
creator HATTORI, Kouhei
ISHIDA, Takahide A.
MIKI, Kaori
SUZUKI, Mayuko
KIMURA, Masahito T.
description To evaluate the responses of Quercus crispula and Quercus dentata to herbivory, their leaves were subjected to simulated herbivory in early spring and examined for the subsequent changes in leaf traits and attacks by chewing herbivores in mid summer. In Quercus crispula, nitrogen content per area was higher in artificially damaged leaves than in control leaves. This species is assumed to increase the photosynthetic rate per area by increasing nitrogen content per area to compensate leaf area loss. In Quercus dentata, nitrogen content per area did not differ between artificially damaged and control leaves, while nitrogen content per mass was slightly lower in artificially damaged leaves. The difference in their responses can be attributable to the difference in the architecture of their leaves and/or the severeness of herbivory. The development of leaf area from early spring to mid summer was larger in artificially damaged leaves than in control leaves in both species, suggesting the compensatory response to leaf area loss. Leaf dry mass per unit area was also larger in artificially damaged leaves in both species, but the adaptive significance of this change is not clear. In spite of such changes in leaf traits, no difference was detected in the degree of damage by chewing herbivores between artificially damaged and controlled leaves in both species.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1440-1703.2004.00641.x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17977337</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2447094871</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3931-b8fb29f9eef8b4b7aac91373be8a3aab766a6abb28cbd11a16e5be6a2c036f803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE9LxDAQxYMouK5-h-DBW2vS1CYFL7Kuf2BBFD15CEk6wZRuuiatu_vtbV3ZgyfnMsPMe4_hhxCmJKVDXdYpzXOSUE5YmhGSp4QUOU03B2iyPxyiCSlpljBB82N0EmNNCM1KTibo_dZZCwG8gYidxwHiqvURcNfi6JZ9ozqo8AcE7b7asMUaujWAx889BNNHbIKLq0GFla_2ywp8pzp1io6saiKc_fYperubv84eksXT_ePsZpEYVjKaaGF1VtoSwAqda66UKSnjTINQTCnNi0IVSutMGF1RqmgBVxoKlRnCCisIm6KLXe4qtJ89xE4uXTTQNMpD20dJeck5GxKn6PyPsG774IffpBAiI4zlo0jsRCa0MQawchXcUoWtpESOyGUtR7JyJCtH5PIHudwM1uudde0a2P7bJ-cv82Fg3w55iPU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>888203347</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differences in response to simulated herbivory between Quercus crispula and Quercus dentata</title><source>SpringerLink Contemporary</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>HATTORI, Kouhei ; ISHIDA, Takahide A. ; MIKI, Kaori ; SUZUKI, Mayuko ; KIMURA, Masahito T.</creator><creatorcontrib>HATTORI, Kouhei ; ISHIDA, Takahide A. ; MIKI, Kaori ; SUZUKI, Mayuko ; KIMURA, Masahito T.</creatorcontrib><description>To evaluate the responses of Quercus crispula and Quercus dentata to herbivory, their leaves were subjected to simulated herbivory in early spring and examined for the subsequent changes in leaf traits and attacks by chewing herbivores in mid summer. In Quercus crispula, nitrogen content per area was higher in artificially damaged leaves than in control leaves. This species is assumed to increase the photosynthetic rate per area by increasing nitrogen content per area to compensate leaf area loss. In Quercus dentata, nitrogen content per area did not differ between artificially damaged and control leaves, while nitrogen content per mass was slightly lower in artificially damaged leaves. The difference in their responses can be attributable to the difference in the architecture of their leaves and/or the severeness of herbivory. The development of leaf area from early spring to mid summer was larger in artificially damaged leaves than in control leaves in both species, suggesting the compensatory response to leaf area loss. Leaf dry mass per unit area was also larger in artificially damaged leaves in both species, but the adaptive significance of this change is not clear. In spite of such changes in leaf traits, no difference was detected in the degree of damage by chewing herbivores between artificially damaged and controlled leaves in both species.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0912-3814</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1440-1703</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1703.2004.00641.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melbourne, Australia: Blackwell Science Pty</publisher><subject>compensation ; Herbivores ; Herbivory ; induced defense ; Leaves ; Nitrogen ; nitrogen content ; Quercus ; Quercus crispula ; Quercus dentata ; simulated herbivory ; Spring ; Summer</subject><ispartof>Ecological research, 2004-05, Vol.19 (3), p.323-329</ispartof><rights>Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3931-b8fb29f9eef8b4b7aac91373be8a3aab766a6abb28cbd11a16e5be6a2c036f803</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3931-b8fb29f9eef8b4b7aac91373be8a3aab766a6abb28cbd11a16e5be6a2c036f803</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>HATTORI, Kouhei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ISHIDA, Takahide A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MIKI, Kaori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SUZUKI, Mayuko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KIMURA, Masahito T.</creatorcontrib><title>Differences in response to simulated herbivory between Quercus crispula and Quercus dentata</title><title>Ecological research</title><description>To evaluate the responses of Quercus crispula and Quercus dentata to herbivory, their leaves were subjected to simulated herbivory in early spring and examined for the subsequent changes in leaf traits and attacks by chewing herbivores in mid summer. In Quercus crispula, nitrogen content per area was higher in artificially damaged leaves than in control leaves. This species is assumed to increase the photosynthetic rate per area by increasing nitrogen content per area to compensate leaf area loss. In Quercus dentata, nitrogen content per area did not differ between artificially damaged and control leaves, while nitrogen content per mass was slightly lower in artificially damaged leaves. The difference in their responses can be attributable to the difference in the architecture of their leaves and/or the severeness of herbivory. The development of leaf area from early spring to mid summer was larger in artificially damaged leaves than in control leaves in both species, suggesting the compensatory response to leaf area loss. Leaf dry mass per unit area was also larger in artificially damaged leaves in both species, but the adaptive significance of this change is not clear. In spite of such changes in leaf traits, no difference was detected in the degree of damage by chewing herbivores between artificially damaged and controlled leaves in both species.</description><subject>compensation</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>Herbivory</subject><subject>induced defense</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>nitrogen content</subject><subject>Quercus</subject><subject>Quercus crispula</subject><subject>Quercus dentata</subject><subject>simulated herbivory</subject><subject>Spring</subject><subject>Summer</subject><issn>0912-3814</issn><issn>1440-1703</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkE9LxDAQxYMouK5-h-DBW2vS1CYFL7Kuf2BBFD15CEk6wZRuuiatu_vtbV3ZgyfnMsPMe4_hhxCmJKVDXdYpzXOSUE5YmhGSp4QUOU03B2iyPxyiCSlpljBB82N0EmNNCM1KTibo_dZZCwG8gYidxwHiqvURcNfi6JZ9ozqo8AcE7b7asMUaujWAx889BNNHbIKLq0GFla_2ywp8pzp1io6saiKc_fYperubv84eksXT_ePsZpEYVjKaaGF1VtoSwAqda66UKSnjTINQTCnNi0IVSutMGF1RqmgBVxoKlRnCCisIm6KLXe4qtJ89xE4uXTTQNMpD20dJeck5GxKn6PyPsG774IffpBAiI4zlo0jsRCa0MQawchXcUoWtpESOyGUtR7JyJCtH5PIHudwM1uudde0a2P7bJ-cv82Fg3w55iPU</recordid><startdate>200405</startdate><enddate>200405</enddate><creator>HATTORI, Kouhei</creator><creator>ISHIDA, Takahide A.</creator><creator>MIKI, Kaori</creator><creator>SUZUKI, Mayuko</creator><creator>KIMURA, Masahito T.</creator><general>Blackwell Science Pty</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200405</creationdate><title>Differences in response to simulated herbivory between Quercus crispula and Quercus dentata</title><author>HATTORI, Kouhei ; ISHIDA, Takahide A. ; MIKI, Kaori ; SUZUKI, Mayuko ; KIMURA, Masahito T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3931-b8fb29f9eef8b4b7aac91373be8a3aab766a6abb28cbd11a16e5be6a2c036f803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>compensation</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>Herbivory</topic><topic>induced defense</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>nitrogen content</topic><topic>Quercus</topic><topic>Quercus crispula</topic><topic>Quercus dentata</topic><topic>simulated herbivory</topic><topic>Spring</topic><topic>Summer</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>HATTORI, Kouhei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ISHIDA, Takahide A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MIKI, Kaori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SUZUKI, Mayuko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KIMURA, Masahito T.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Ecological research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>HATTORI, Kouhei</au><au>ISHIDA, Takahide A.</au><au>MIKI, Kaori</au><au>SUZUKI, Mayuko</au><au>KIMURA, Masahito T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differences in response to simulated herbivory between Quercus crispula and Quercus dentata</atitle><jtitle>Ecological research</jtitle><date>2004-05</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>323</spage><epage>329</epage><pages>323-329</pages><issn>0912-3814</issn><eissn>1440-1703</eissn><abstract>To evaluate the responses of Quercus crispula and Quercus dentata to herbivory, their leaves were subjected to simulated herbivory in early spring and examined for the subsequent changes in leaf traits and attacks by chewing herbivores in mid summer. In Quercus crispula, nitrogen content per area was higher in artificially damaged leaves than in control leaves. This species is assumed to increase the photosynthetic rate per area by increasing nitrogen content per area to compensate leaf area loss. In Quercus dentata, nitrogen content per area did not differ between artificially damaged and control leaves, while nitrogen content per mass was slightly lower in artificially damaged leaves. The difference in their responses can be attributable to the difference in the architecture of their leaves and/or the severeness of herbivory. The development of leaf area from early spring to mid summer was larger in artificially damaged leaves than in control leaves in both species, suggesting the compensatory response to leaf area loss. Leaf dry mass per unit area was also larger in artificially damaged leaves in both species, but the adaptive significance of this change is not clear. In spite of such changes in leaf traits, no difference was detected in the degree of damage by chewing herbivores between artificially damaged and controlled leaves in both species.</abstract><cop>Melbourne, Australia</cop><pub>Blackwell Science Pty</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1440-1703.2004.00641.x</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0912-3814
ispartof Ecological research, 2004-05, Vol.19 (3), p.323-329
issn 0912-3814
1440-1703
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17977337
source SpringerLink Contemporary; Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects compensation
Herbivores
Herbivory
induced defense
Leaves
Nitrogen
nitrogen content
Quercus
Quercus crispula
Quercus dentata
simulated herbivory
Spring
Summer
title Differences in response to simulated herbivory between Quercus crispula and Quercus dentata
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T14%3A34%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differences%20in%20response%20to%20simulated%20herbivory%20between%20Quercus%20crispula%20and%20Quercus%20dentata&rft.jtitle=Ecological%20research&rft.au=HATTORI,%20Kouhei&rft.date=2004-05&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=323&rft.epage=329&rft.pages=323-329&rft.issn=0912-3814&rft.eissn=1440-1703&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1440-1703.2004.00641.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2447094871%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3931-b8fb29f9eef8b4b7aac91373be8a3aab766a6abb28cbd11a16e5be6a2c036f803%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=888203347&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true