Loading…
Differences in response to simulated herbivory between Quercus crispula and Quercus dentata
To evaluate the responses of Quercus crispula and Quercus dentata to herbivory, their leaves were subjected to simulated herbivory in early spring and examined for the subsequent changes in leaf traits and attacks by chewing herbivores in mid summer. In Quercus crispula, nitrogen content per area wa...
Saved in:
Published in: | Ecological research 2004-05, Vol.19 (3), p.323-329 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3931-b8fb29f9eef8b4b7aac91373be8a3aab766a6abb28cbd11a16e5be6a2c036f803 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3931-b8fb29f9eef8b4b7aac91373be8a3aab766a6abb28cbd11a16e5be6a2c036f803 |
container_end_page | 329 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 323 |
container_title | Ecological research |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | HATTORI, Kouhei ISHIDA, Takahide A. MIKI, Kaori SUZUKI, Mayuko KIMURA, Masahito T. |
description | To evaluate the responses of Quercus crispula and Quercus dentata to herbivory, their leaves were subjected to simulated herbivory in early spring and examined for the subsequent changes in leaf traits and attacks by chewing herbivores in mid summer. In Quercus crispula, nitrogen content per area was higher in artificially damaged leaves than in control leaves. This species is assumed to increase the photosynthetic rate per area by increasing nitrogen content per area to compensate leaf area loss. In Quercus dentata, nitrogen content per area did not differ between artificially damaged and control leaves, while nitrogen content per mass was slightly lower in artificially damaged leaves. The difference in their responses can be attributable to the difference in the architecture of their leaves and/or the severeness of herbivory. The development of leaf area from early spring to mid summer was larger in artificially damaged leaves than in control leaves in both species, suggesting the compensatory response to leaf area loss. Leaf dry mass per unit area was also larger in artificially damaged leaves in both species, but the adaptive significance of this change is not clear. In spite of such changes in leaf traits, no difference was detected in the degree of damage by chewing herbivores between artificially damaged and controlled leaves in both species. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1440-1703.2004.00641.x |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17977337</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2447094871</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3931-b8fb29f9eef8b4b7aac91373be8a3aab766a6abb28cbd11a16e5be6a2c036f803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE9LxDAQxYMouK5-h-DBW2vS1CYFL7Kuf2BBFD15CEk6wZRuuiatu_vtbV3ZgyfnMsPMe4_hhxCmJKVDXdYpzXOSUE5YmhGSp4QUOU03B2iyPxyiCSlpljBB82N0EmNNCM1KTibo_dZZCwG8gYidxwHiqvURcNfi6JZ9ozqo8AcE7b7asMUaujWAx889BNNHbIKLq0GFla_2ywp8pzp1io6saiKc_fYperubv84eksXT_ePsZpEYVjKaaGF1VtoSwAqda66UKSnjTINQTCnNi0IVSutMGF1RqmgBVxoKlRnCCisIm6KLXe4qtJ89xE4uXTTQNMpD20dJeck5GxKn6PyPsG774IffpBAiI4zlo0jsRCa0MQawchXcUoWtpESOyGUtR7JyJCtH5PIHudwM1uudde0a2P7bJ-cv82Fg3w55iPU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>888203347</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differences in response to simulated herbivory between Quercus crispula and Quercus dentata</title><source>SpringerLink Contemporary</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>HATTORI, Kouhei ; ISHIDA, Takahide A. ; MIKI, Kaori ; SUZUKI, Mayuko ; KIMURA, Masahito T.</creator><creatorcontrib>HATTORI, Kouhei ; ISHIDA, Takahide A. ; MIKI, Kaori ; SUZUKI, Mayuko ; KIMURA, Masahito T.</creatorcontrib><description>To evaluate the responses of Quercus crispula and Quercus dentata to herbivory, their leaves were subjected to simulated herbivory in early spring and examined for the subsequent changes in leaf traits and attacks by chewing herbivores in mid summer. In Quercus crispula, nitrogen content per area was higher in artificially damaged leaves than in control leaves. This species is assumed to increase the photosynthetic rate per area by increasing nitrogen content per area to compensate leaf area loss. In Quercus dentata, nitrogen content per area did not differ between artificially damaged and control leaves, while nitrogen content per mass was slightly lower in artificially damaged leaves. The difference in their responses can be attributable to the difference in the architecture of their leaves and/or the severeness of herbivory. The development of leaf area from early spring to mid summer was larger in artificially damaged leaves than in control leaves in both species, suggesting the compensatory response to leaf area loss. Leaf dry mass per unit area was also larger in artificially damaged leaves in both species, but the adaptive significance of this change is not clear. In spite of such changes in leaf traits, no difference was detected in the degree of damage by chewing herbivores between artificially damaged and controlled leaves in both species.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0912-3814</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1440-1703</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1703.2004.00641.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melbourne, Australia: Blackwell Science Pty</publisher><subject>compensation ; Herbivores ; Herbivory ; induced defense ; Leaves ; Nitrogen ; nitrogen content ; Quercus ; Quercus crispula ; Quercus dentata ; simulated herbivory ; Spring ; Summer</subject><ispartof>Ecological research, 2004-05, Vol.19 (3), p.323-329</ispartof><rights>Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3931-b8fb29f9eef8b4b7aac91373be8a3aab766a6abb28cbd11a16e5be6a2c036f803</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3931-b8fb29f9eef8b4b7aac91373be8a3aab766a6abb28cbd11a16e5be6a2c036f803</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>HATTORI, Kouhei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ISHIDA, Takahide A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MIKI, Kaori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SUZUKI, Mayuko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KIMURA, Masahito T.</creatorcontrib><title>Differences in response to simulated herbivory between Quercus crispula and Quercus dentata</title><title>Ecological research</title><description>To evaluate the responses of Quercus crispula and Quercus dentata to herbivory, their leaves were subjected to simulated herbivory in early spring and examined for the subsequent changes in leaf traits and attacks by chewing herbivores in mid summer. In Quercus crispula, nitrogen content per area was higher in artificially damaged leaves than in control leaves. This species is assumed to increase the photosynthetic rate per area by increasing nitrogen content per area to compensate leaf area loss. In Quercus dentata, nitrogen content per area did not differ between artificially damaged and control leaves, while nitrogen content per mass was slightly lower in artificially damaged leaves. The difference in their responses can be attributable to the difference in the architecture of their leaves and/or the severeness of herbivory. The development of leaf area from early spring to mid summer was larger in artificially damaged leaves than in control leaves in both species, suggesting the compensatory response to leaf area loss. Leaf dry mass per unit area was also larger in artificially damaged leaves in both species, but the adaptive significance of this change is not clear. In spite of such changes in leaf traits, no difference was detected in the degree of damage by chewing herbivores between artificially damaged and controlled leaves in both species.</description><subject>compensation</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>Herbivory</subject><subject>induced defense</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>nitrogen content</subject><subject>Quercus</subject><subject>Quercus crispula</subject><subject>Quercus dentata</subject><subject>simulated herbivory</subject><subject>Spring</subject><subject>Summer</subject><issn>0912-3814</issn><issn>1440-1703</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkE9LxDAQxYMouK5-h-DBW2vS1CYFL7Kuf2BBFD15CEk6wZRuuiatu_vtbV3ZgyfnMsPMe4_hhxCmJKVDXdYpzXOSUE5YmhGSp4QUOU03B2iyPxyiCSlpljBB82N0EmNNCM1KTibo_dZZCwG8gYidxwHiqvURcNfi6JZ9ozqo8AcE7b7asMUaujWAx889BNNHbIKLq0GFla_2ywp8pzp1io6saiKc_fYperubv84eksXT_ePsZpEYVjKaaGF1VtoSwAqda66UKSnjTINQTCnNi0IVSutMGF1RqmgBVxoKlRnCCisIm6KLXe4qtJ89xE4uXTTQNMpD20dJeck5GxKn6PyPsG774IffpBAiI4zlo0jsRCa0MQawchXcUoWtpESOyGUtR7JyJCtH5PIHudwM1uudde0a2P7bJ-cv82Fg3w55iPU</recordid><startdate>200405</startdate><enddate>200405</enddate><creator>HATTORI, Kouhei</creator><creator>ISHIDA, Takahide A.</creator><creator>MIKI, Kaori</creator><creator>SUZUKI, Mayuko</creator><creator>KIMURA, Masahito T.</creator><general>Blackwell Science Pty</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200405</creationdate><title>Differences in response to simulated herbivory between Quercus crispula and Quercus dentata</title><author>HATTORI, Kouhei ; ISHIDA, Takahide A. ; MIKI, Kaori ; SUZUKI, Mayuko ; KIMURA, Masahito T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3931-b8fb29f9eef8b4b7aac91373be8a3aab766a6abb28cbd11a16e5be6a2c036f803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>compensation</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>Herbivory</topic><topic>induced defense</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>nitrogen content</topic><topic>Quercus</topic><topic>Quercus crispula</topic><topic>Quercus dentata</topic><topic>simulated herbivory</topic><topic>Spring</topic><topic>Summer</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>HATTORI, Kouhei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ISHIDA, Takahide A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MIKI, Kaori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SUZUKI, Mayuko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KIMURA, Masahito T.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Ecological research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>HATTORI, Kouhei</au><au>ISHIDA, Takahide A.</au><au>MIKI, Kaori</au><au>SUZUKI, Mayuko</au><au>KIMURA, Masahito T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differences in response to simulated herbivory between Quercus crispula and Quercus dentata</atitle><jtitle>Ecological research</jtitle><date>2004-05</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>323</spage><epage>329</epage><pages>323-329</pages><issn>0912-3814</issn><eissn>1440-1703</eissn><abstract>To evaluate the responses of Quercus crispula and Quercus dentata to herbivory, their leaves were subjected to simulated herbivory in early spring and examined for the subsequent changes in leaf traits and attacks by chewing herbivores in mid summer. In Quercus crispula, nitrogen content per area was higher in artificially damaged leaves than in control leaves. This species is assumed to increase the photosynthetic rate per area by increasing nitrogen content per area to compensate leaf area loss. In Quercus dentata, nitrogen content per area did not differ between artificially damaged and control leaves, while nitrogen content per mass was slightly lower in artificially damaged leaves. The difference in their responses can be attributable to the difference in the architecture of their leaves and/or the severeness of herbivory. The development of leaf area from early spring to mid summer was larger in artificially damaged leaves than in control leaves in both species, suggesting the compensatory response to leaf area loss. Leaf dry mass per unit area was also larger in artificially damaged leaves in both species, but the adaptive significance of this change is not clear. In spite of such changes in leaf traits, no difference was detected in the degree of damage by chewing herbivores between artificially damaged and controlled leaves in both species.</abstract><cop>Melbourne, Australia</cop><pub>Blackwell Science Pty</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1440-1703.2004.00641.x</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0912-3814 |
ispartof | Ecological research, 2004-05, Vol.19 (3), p.323-329 |
issn | 0912-3814 1440-1703 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17977337 |
source | SpringerLink Contemporary; Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | compensation Herbivores Herbivory induced defense Leaves Nitrogen nitrogen content Quercus Quercus crispula Quercus dentata simulated herbivory Spring Summer |
title | Differences in response to simulated herbivory between Quercus crispula and Quercus dentata |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T14%3A34%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differences%20in%20response%20to%20simulated%20herbivory%20between%20Quercus%20crispula%20and%20Quercus%20dentata&rft.jtitle=Ecological%20research&rft.au=HATTORI,%20Kouhei&rft.date=2004-05&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=323&rft.epage=329&rft.pages=323-329&rft.issn=0912-3814&rft.eissn=1440-1703&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1440-1703.2004.00641.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2447094871%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3931-b8fb29f9eef8b4b7aac91373be8a3aab766a6abb28cbd11a16e5be6a2c036f803%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=888203347&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |