Loading…
The Mating System of Steelhead, Oncorhynchus mykiss, Inferred by Molecular Analysis of Parents and Progeny
The development of molecular markers has allowed behavioral ecologists to link parents to specific offspring, providing insights into breeding systems that were not apparent from direct observations of the social system. Studies of this type in fishes have focused on species with male parental care...
Saved in:
Published in: | Environmental biology of fishes 2004-03, Vol.69 (1-4), p.333-344 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The development of molecular markers has allowed behavioral ecologists to link parents to specific offspring, providing insights into breeding systems that were not apparent from direct observations of the social system. Studies of this type in fishes have focused on species with male parental care such as centrarchids, and on salmonids, a family with little parental care. In order to gain further insight into the mating system of steelhead trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss, a winter-spawning species whose reproductive system is poorly known, adults returning to spawn were captured in four consecutive years in a small, unfished, wild population. Juvenile offspring were sampled by electrofishing and parentage was determined by exclusion based on a 12 locus microsatellite genotype. Both males and females mated with multiple individuals, though single pair matings were also inferred. Females and males tended to have the same number of mates (median = 1), but males were more likely to have no apparent partner (43% vs. 23% for females) and the maximum number of mates were obtained by males (range 0-10 vs. 0-5 for females). There was no difference in median arrival date by sex, but 80% of the females mated with males that had already arrived rather than males arriving with or after the females (median = 7.5, range = 1-63 days difference). Contrary to expectations, there was no evidence of size-assortative mating; larger males and larger females did not tend to mate with each other more often than would have occurred by chance. Of the juveniles with only one identified parent, most had a known mother and an unknown father rather than the reverse (88% vs. 11%). We interpret this as indirect evidence that non-anadromous males achieved a significant number of fertilizations. Thus the steelhead mating system was complex, being more strongly structured by arrival date than fish size, and including a significant genetic contribution by mature male parr. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0378-1909 1573-5133 |
DOI: | 10.1023/B:EBFI.0000022893.88086.8f |