Loading…

Evolution and challenges of dynamic global vegetation models for some aspects of plant physiology and elevated atmospheric CO2

Dynamic global vegetation models (DGVMs) simulate surface processes such as the transfer of energy, water, CO₂, and momentum between the terrestrial surface and the atmosphere, biogeochemical cycles, carbon assimilation by vegetation, phenology, and land use change in scenarios of varying atmosphe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of biometeorology 2016-07, Vol.60 (7), p.945-955
Main Authors: Rezende, L. F. C, B. C. Arenque, S. T. Aidar, M. S. B. Moura, C. Von Randow, E. Tourigny, R. S. C. Menezes, J. P. H. B. Ometto
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Dynamic global vegetation models (DGVMs) simulate surface processes such as the transfer of energy, water, CO₂, and momentum between the terrestrial surface and the atmosphere, biogeochemical cycles, carbon assimilation by vegetation, phenology, and land use change in scenarios of varying atmospheric CO₂ concentrations. DGVMs increase the complexity and the Earth system representation when they are coupled with atmospheric global circulation models (AGCMs) or climate models. However, plant physiological processes are still a major source of uncertainty in DGVMs. The maximum velocity of carboxylation (Vcₘₐₓ), for example, has a direct impact over productivity in the models. This parameter is often underestimated or imprecisely defined for the various plant functional types (PFTs) and ecosystems. Vcₘₐₓ is directly related to photosynthesis acclimation (loss of response to elevated CO₂), a widely known phenomenon that usually occurs when plants are subjected to elevated atmospheric CO₂ and might affect productivity estimation in DGVMs. Despite this, current models have improved substantially, compared to earlier models which had a rudimentary and very simple representation of vegetation–atmosphere interactions. In this paper, we describe this evolution through generations of models and the main events that contributed to their improvements until the current state-of-the-art class of models. Also, we describe some main challenges for further improvements to DGVMs.
ISSN:0020-7128
1432-1254
DOI:10.1007/s00484-015-1087-6