Loading…

Evaluation of Alternatives to Carbamate and Organophosphate Insecticides Against Thrips and Tomato Spotted Wilt Virus in Peanut Production

Thrips are important pests of peanut. They cause severe feeding injuries on peanut foliage in the early season. They also transmit Tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV), which causes spotted wilt disease. At-plant insecticides and cultivars that exhibit field resistance to TSWV are often used to manage t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of economic entomology 2016-04, Vol.109 (2), p.544-557
Main Authors: Marasigan, K, Toews, M, Kemerait, R, Abney, M. R, Culbreath, A, Srinivasan, R
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b378t-b958661b9815ac50ac7d12569e45200141f1882afd837630b94e9ca6b8df3c3a3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b378t-b958661b9815ac50ac7d12569e45200141f1882afd837630b94e9ca6b8df3c3a3
container_end_page 557
container_issue 2
container_start_page 544
container_title Journal of economic entomology
container_volume 109
creator Marasigan, K
Toews, M
Kemerait, R
Abney, M. R
Culbreath, A
Srinivasan, R
description Thrips are important pests of peanut. They cause severe feeding injuries on peanut foliage in the early season. They also transmit Tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV), which causes spotted wilt disease. At-plant insecticides and cultivars that exhibit field resistance to TSWV are often used to manage thrips and spotted wilt disease. Historically, peanut growers used the broad-spectrum insecticides aldicarb (IRAC class 1A; Temik) and phorate (IRAC class 1B; Thimet) for managing thrips and thereby reducing TSWV transmission. Aldicarb has not been produced since 2011 and its usage in peanut will be legally phased out in 2018; therefore, identification of alternative chemistries is critical for thrips and spotted wilt management. Here, eight alternative insecticides, with known thrips activity, were evaluated in field trials conducted from 2011 through 2013. In addition, different application methods of alternatives were also evaluated. Imidacloprid (Admire Pro), thiamethoxam (Actara), spinetoram (Radiant), and cyantraniliprole (Exirel) were as effective as aldicarb and phorate in suppressing thrips, but none of the insecticides significantly suppressed spotted wilt incidence. Nevertheless, greenhouse assays demonstrated that the same alternative insecticides were effective in suppressing thrips feeding and reducing TSWV transmission. Spotted wilt incidence in the greenhouse was more severe (∼80%) than in the field (5–25%). In general, field resistance to TSWV in cultivars only marginally influenced spotted wilt incidence. Results suggest that effective management of thrips using alternative insecticides and subsequent feeding reduction could improve yields under low to moderate virus pressure.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/jee/tov336
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1801436560</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/jee/tov336</oup_id><sourcerecordid>4303472531</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b378t-b958661b9815ac50ac7d12569e45200141f1882afd837630b94e9ca6b8df3c3a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90U9LHDEYBvBQKnW1XvoBSqAUpDCaTGayyXFZrAqCgtvW25DJZNwss3mn-bPQr-CnNutuPXjwFBJ-ecKbB6EvlJxRItn5ypjzCBvG-Ac0oZKJopT04SOaEFKWBakkO0RHIawIobyk5BM6LDln05pVE_R0sVFDUtGCw9Dj2RCNd3m7MQFHwHPlW7VW0WDlOnzrH5WDcQlhXG7Prl0wOlptu6xnj8q6EPFi6e0YXvwC8lXA9yPEaDr8xw4R_7Y-BWwdvjPKpYjvPHRJb9__jA56NQRzsl-P0a-fF4v5VXFze3k9n90ULZuKWLSyFpzTVgpaK10TpacdLWsuTVWXecSK9lSIUvWdYFPOSCsrI7Xireh6pplix-h0lzt6-JtMiM3aBm2GQTkDKTRU5BDGa04y_faGriDl_xm2qpYVkYRVWf3YKe0hBG_6ZvR2rfy_hpJm21CTG2p2DWX8dR-Z2rXpXun_SjL4vgOQxveD9mO0FsCZ9-gz6tOohg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1859409034</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of Alternatives to Carbamate and Organophosphate Insecticides Against Thrips and Tomato Spotted Wilt Virus in Peanut Production</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Marasigan, K ; Toews, M ; Kemerait, R ; Abney, M. R ; Culbreath, A ; Srinivasan, R</creator><creatorcontrib>Marasigan, K ; Toews, M ; Kemerait, R ; Abney, M. R ; Culbreath, A ; Srinivasan, R</creatorcontrib><description>Thrips are important pests of peanut. They cause severe feeding injuries on peanut foliage in the early season. They also transmit Tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV), which causes spotted wilt disease. At-plant insecticides and cultivars that exhibit field resistance to TSWV are often used to manage thrips and spotted wilt disease. Historically, peanut growers used the broad-spectrum insecticides aldicarb (IRAC class 1A; Temik) and phorate (IRAC class 1B; Thimet) for managing thrips and thereby reducing TSWV transmission. Aldicarb has not been produced since 2011 and its usage in peanut will be legally phased out in 2018; therefore, identification of alternative chemistries is critical for thrips and spotted wilt management. Here, eight alternative insecticides, with known thrips activity, were evaluated in field trials conducted from 2011 through 2013. In addition, different application methods of alternatives were also evaluated. Imidacloprid (Admire Pro), thiamethoxam (Actara), spinetoram (Radiant), and cyantraniliprole (Exirel) were as effective as aldicarb and phorate in suppressing thrips, but none of the insecticides significantly suppressed spotted wilt incidence. Nevertheless, greenhouse assays demonstrated that the same alternative insecticides were effective in suppressing thrips feeding and reducing TSWV transmission. Spotted wilt incidence in the greenhouse was more severe (∼80%) than in the field (5–25%). In general, field resistance to TSWV in cultivars only marginally influenced spotted wilt incidence. Results suggest that effective management of thrips using alternative insecticides and subsequent feeding reduction could improve yields under low to moderate virus pressure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0493</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-291X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jee/tov336</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26637534</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Entomological Society of America</publisher><subject>Animals ; Arachis - virology ; ARTHROPODS IN RELATION TO PLANT DISEASE ; Biomass ; Crop diseases ; Cultivars ; Foliage ; Greenhouses ; Herbivory ; Insect Vectors - virology ; Insecticides ; Legumes ; Organophosphates ; Peanuts ; Pest control ; Plant Diseases ; Population Density ; spotted wilt ; Thysanoptera - virology ; tobacco thrips ; Tomatoes ; Tospovirus - isolation &amp; purification ; vector and disease management</subject><ispartof>Journal of economic entomology, 2016-04, Vol.109 (2), p.544-557</ispartof><rights>The Authors 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com journals.permissions@oup.com</rights><rights>The Authors 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com 2015</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press, UK Apr 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b378t-b958661b9815ac50ac7d12569e45200141f1882afd837630b94e9ca6b8df3c3a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b378t-b958661b9815ac50ac7d12569e45200141f1882afd837630b94e9ca6b8df3c3a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26637534$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Marasigan, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toews, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kemerait, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abney, M. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Culbreath, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Srinivasan, R</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of Alternatives to Carbamate and Organophosphate Insecticides Against Thrips and Tomato Spotted Wilt Virus in Peanut Production</title><title>Journal of economic entomology</title><addtitle>J Econ Entomol</addtitle><description>Thrips are important pests of peanut. They cause severe feeding injuries on peanut foliage in the early season. They also transmit Tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV), which causes spotted wilt disease. At-plant insecticides and cultivars that exhibit field resistance to TSWV are often used to manage thrips and spotted wilt disease. Historically, peanut growers used the broad-spectrum insecticides aldicarb (IRAC class 1A; Temik) and phorate (IRAC class 1B; Thimet) for managing thrips and thereby reducing TSWV transmission. Aldicarb has not been produced since 2011 and its usage in peanut will be legally phased out in 2018; therefore, identification of alternative chemistries is critical for thrips and spotted wilt management. Here, eight alternative insecticides, with known thrips activity, were evaluated in field trials conducted from 2011 through 2013. In addition, different application methods of alternatives were also evaluated. Imidacloprid (Admire Pro), thiamethoxam (Actara), spinetoram (Radiant), and cyantraniliprole (Exirel) were as effective as aldicarb and phorate in suppressing thrips, but none of the insecticides significantly suppressed spotted wilt incidence. Nevertheless, greenhouse assays demonstrated that the same alternative insecticides were effective in suppressing thrips feeding and reducing TSWV transmission. Spotted wilt incidence in the greenhouse was more severe (∼80%) than in the field (5–25%). In general, field resistance to TSWV in cultivars only marginally influenced spotted wilt incidence. Results suggest that effective management of thrips using alternative insecticides and subsequent feeding reduction could improve yields under low to moderate virus pressure.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Arachis - virology</subject><subject>ARTHROPODS IN RELATION TO PLANT DISEASE</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Crop diseases</subject><subject>Cultivars</subject><subject>Foliage</subject><subject>Greenhouses</subject><subject>Herbivory</subject><subject>Insect Vectors - virology</subject><subject>Insecticides</subject><subject>Legumes</subject><subject>Organophosphates</subject><subject>Peanuts</subject><subject>Pest control</subject><subject>Plant Diseases</subject><subject>Population Density</subject><subject>spotted wilt</subject><subject>Thysanoptera - virology</subject><subject>tobacco thrips</subject><subject>Tomatoes</subject><subject>Tospovirus - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>vector and disease management</subject><issn>0022-0493</issn><issn>1938-291X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90U9LHDEYBvBQKnW1XvoBSqAUpDCaTGayyXFZrAqCgtvW25DJZNwss3mn-bPQr-CnNutuPXjwFBJ-ecKbB6EvlJxRItn5ypjzCBvG-Ac0oZKJopT04SOaEFKWBakkO0RHIawIobyk5BM6LDln05pVE_R0sVFDUtGCw9Dj2RCNd3m7MQFHwHPlW7VW0WDlOnzrH5WDcQlhXG7Prl0wOlptu6xnj8q6EPFi6e0YXvwC8lXA9yPEaDr8xw4R_7Y-BWwdvjPKpYjvPHRJb9__jA56NQRzsl-P0a-fF4v5VXFze3k9n90ULZuKWLSyFpzTVgpaK10TpacdLWsuTVWXecSK9lSIUvWdYFPOSCsrI7Xireh6pplix-h0lzt6-JtMiM3aBm2GQTkDKTRU5BDGa04y_faGriDl_xm2qpYVkYRVWf3YKe0hBG_6ZvR2rfy_hpJm21CTG2p2DWX8dR-Z2rXpXun_SjL4vgOQxveD9mO0FsCZ9-gz6tOohg</recordid><startdate>20160401</startdate><enddate>20160401</enddate><creator>Marasigan, K</creator><creator>Toews, M</creator><creator>Kemerait, R</creator><creator>Abney, M. R</creator><creator>Culbreath, A</creator><creator>Srinivasan, R</creator><general>Entomological Society of America</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160401</creationdate><title>Evaluation of Alternatives to Carbamate and Organophosphate Insecticides Against Thrips and Tomato Spotted Wilt Virus in Peanut Production</title><author>Marasigan, K ; Toews, M ; Kemerait, R ; Abney, M. R ; Culbreath, A ; Srinivasan, R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b378t-b958661b9815ac50ac7d12569e45200141f1882afd837630b94e9ca6b8df3c3a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Arachis - virology</topic><topic>ARTHROPODS IN RELATION TO PLANT DISEASE</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Crop diseases</topic><topic>Cultivars</topic><topic>Foliage</topic><topic>Greenhouses</topic><topic>Herbivory</topic><topic>Insect Vectors - virology</topic><topic>Insecticides</topic><topic>Legumes</topic><topic>Organophosphates</topic><topic>Peanuts</topic><topic>Pest control</topic><topic>Plant Diseases</topic><topic>Population Density</topic><topic>spotted wilt</topic><topic>Thysanoptera - virology</topic><topic>tobacco thrips</topic><topic>Tomatoes</topic><topic>Tospovirus - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>vector and disease management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Marasigan, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toews, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kemerait, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abney, M. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Culbreath, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Srinivasan, R</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of economic entomology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Marasigan, K</au><au>Toews, M</au><au>Kemerait, R</au><au>Abney, M. R</au><au>Culbreath, A</au><au>Srinivasan, R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of Alternatives to Carbamate and Organophosphate Insecticides Against Thrips and Tomato Spotted Wilt Virus in Peanut Production</atitle><jtitle>Journal of economic entomology</jtitle><addtitle>J Econ Entomol</addtitle><date>2016-04-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>109</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>544</spage><epage>557</epage><pages>544-557</pages><issn>0022-0493</issn><eissn>1938-291X</eissn><abstract>Thrips are important pests of peanut. They cause severe feeding injuries on peanut foliage in the early season. They also transmit Tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV), which causes spotted wilt disease. At-plant insecticides and cultivars that exhibit field resistance to TSWV are often used to manage thrips and spotted wilt disease. Historically, peanut growers used the broad-spectrum insecticides aldicarb (IRAC class 1A; Temik) and phorate (IRAC class 1B; Thimet) for managing thrips and thereby reducing TSWV transmission. Aldicarb has not been produced since 2011 and its usage in peanut will be legally phased out in 2018; therefore, identification of alternative chemistries is critical for thrips and spotted wilt management. Here, eight alternative insecticides, with known thrips activity, were evaluated in field trials conducted from 2011 through 2013. In addition, different application methods of alternatives were also evaluated. Imidacloprid (Admire Pro), thiamethoxam (Actara), spinetoram (Radiant), and cyantraniliprole (Exirel) were as effective as aldicarb and phorate in suppressing thrips, but none of the insecticides significantly suppressed spotted wilt incidence. Nevertheless, greenhouse assays demonstrated that the same alternative insecticides were effective in suppressing thrips feeding and reducing TSWV transmission. Spotted wilt incidence in the greenhouse was more severe (∼80%) than in the field (5–25%). In general, field resistance to TSWV in cultivars only marginally influenced spotted wilt incidence. Results suggest that effective management of thrips using alternative insecticides and subsequent feeding reduction could improve yields under low to moderate virus pressure.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Entomological Society of America</pub><pmid>26637534</pmid><doi>10.1093/jee/tov336</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-0493
ispartof Journal of economic entomology, 2016-04, Vol.109 (2), p.544-557
issn 0022-0493
1938-291X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1801436560
source Oxford Journals Online
subjects Animals
Arachis - virology
ARTHROPODS IN RELATION TO PLANT DISEASE
Biomass
Crop diseases
Cultivars
Foliage
Greenhouses
Herbivory
Insect Vectors - virology
Insecticides
Legumes
Organophosphates
Peanuts
Pest control
Plant Diseases
Population Density
spotted wilt
Thysanoptera - virology
tobacco thrips
Tomatoes
Tospovirus - isolation & purification
vector and disease management
title Evaluation of Alternatives to Carbamate and Organophosphate Insecticides Against Thrips and Tomato Spotted Wilt Virus in Peanut Production
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T12%3A22%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20Alternatives%20to%20Carbamate%20and%20Organophosphate%20Insecticides%20Against%20Thrips%20and%20Tomato%20Spotted%20Wilt%20Virus%20in%20Peanut%20Production&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20economic%20entomology&rft.au=Marasigan,%20K&rft.date=2016-04-01&rft.volume=109&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=544&rft.epage=557&rft.pages=544-557&rft.issn=0022-0493&rft.eissn=1938-291X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jee/tov336&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4303472531%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b378t-b958661b9815ac50ac7d12569e45200141f1882afd837630b94e9ca6b8df3c3a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1859409034&rft_id=info:pmid/26637534&rft_oup_id=10.1093/jee/tov336&rfr_iscdi=true