Loading…
Evaluation of Alternatives to Carbamate and Organophosphate Insecticides Against Thrips and Tomato Spotted Wilt Virus in Peanut Production
Thrips are important pests of peanut. They cause severe feeding injuries on peanut foliage in the early season. They also transmit Tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV), which causes spotted wilt disease. At-plant insecticides and cultivars that exhibit field resistance to TSWV are often used to manage t...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of economic entomology 2016-04, Vol.109 (2), p.544-557 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b378t-b958661b9815ac50ac7d12569e45200141f1882afd837630b94e9ca6b8df3c3a3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b378t-b958661b9815ac50ac7d12569e45200141f1882afd837630b94e9ca6b8df3c3a3 |
container_end_page | 557 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 544 |
container_title | Journal of economic entomology |
container_volume | 109 |
creator | Marasigan, K Toews, M Kemerait, R Abney, M. R Culbreath, A Srinivasan, R |
description | Thrips are important pests of peanut. They cause severe feeding injuries on peanut foliage in the early season. They also transmit Tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV), which causes spotted wilt disease. At-plant insecticides and cultivars that exhibit field resistance to TSWV are often used to manage thrips and spotted wilt disease. Historically, peanut growers used the broad-spectrum insecticides aldicarb (IRAC class 1A; Temik) and phorate (IRAC class 1B; Thimet) for managing thrips and thereby reducing TSWV transmission. Aldicarb has not been produced since 2011 and its usage in peanut will be legally phased out in 2018; therefore, identification of alternative chemistries is critical for thrips and spotted wilt management. Here, eight alternative insecticides, with known thrips activity, were evaluated in field trials conducted from 2011 through 2013. In addition, different application methods of alternatives were also evaluated. Imidacloprid (Admire Pro), thiamethoxam (Actara), spinetoram (Radiant), and cyantraniliprole (Exirel) were as effective as aldicarb and phorate in suppressing thrips, but none of the insecticides significantly suppressed spotted wilt incidence. Nevertheless, greenhouse assays demonstrated that the same alternative insecticides were effective in suppressing thrips feeding and reducing TSWV transmission. Spotted wilt incidence in the greenhouse was more severe (∼80%) than in the field (5–25%). In general, field resistance to TSWV in cultivars only marginally influenced spotted wilt incidence. Results suggest that effective management of thrips using alternative insecticides and subsequent feeding reduction could improve yields under low to moderate virus pressure. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/jee/tov336 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1801436560</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/jee/tov336</oup_id><sourcerecordid>4303472531</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b378t-b958661b9815ac50ac7d12569e45200141f1882afd837630b94e9ca6b8df3c3a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90U9LHDEYBvBQKnW1XvoBSqAUpDCaTGayyXFZrAqCgtvW25DJZNwss3mn-bPQr-CnNutuPXjwFBJ-ecKbB6EvlJxRItn5ypjzCBvG-Ac0oZKJopT04SOaEFKWBakkO0RHIawIobyk5BM6LDln05pVE_R0sVFDUtGCw9Dj2RCNd3m7MQFHwHPlW7VW0WDlOnzrH5WDcQlhXG7Prl0wOlptu6xnj8q6EPFi6e0YXvwC8lXA9yPEaDr8xw4R_7Y-BWwdvjPKpYjvPHRJb9__jA56NQRzsl-P0a-fF4v5VXFze3k9n90ULZuKWLSyFpzTVgpaK10TpacdLWsuTVWXecSK9lSIUvWdYFPOSCsrI7Xireh6pplix-h0lzt6-JtMiM3aBm2GQTkDKTRU5BDGa04y_faGriDl_xm2qpYVkYRVWf3YKe0hBG_6ZvR2rfy_hpJm21CTG2p2DWX8dR-Z2rXpXun_SjL4vgOQxveD9mO0FsCZ9-gz6tOohg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1859409034</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of Alternatives to Carbamate and Organophosphate Insecticides Against Thrips and Tomato Spotted Wilt Virus in Peanut Production</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Marasigan, K ; Toews, M ; Kemerait, R ; Abney, M. R ; Culbreath, A ; Srinivasan, R</creator><creatorcontrib>Marasigan, K ; Toews, M ; Kemerait, R ; Abney, M. R ; Culbreath, A ; Srinivasan, R</creatorcontrib><description>Thrips are important pests of peanut. They cause severe feeding injuries on peanut foliage in the early season. They also transmit Tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV), which causes spotted wilt disease. At-plant insecticides and cultivars that exhibit field resistance to TSWV are often used to manage thrips and spotted wilt disease. Historically, peanut growers used the broad-spectrum insecticides aldicarb (IRAC class 1A; Temik) and phorate (IRAC class 1B; Thimet) for managing thrips and thereby reducing TSWV transmission. Aldicarb has not been produced since 2011 and its usage in peanut will be legally phased out in 2018; therefore, identification of alternative chemistries is critical for thrips and spotted wilt management. Here, eight alternative insecticides, with known thrips activity, were evaluated in field trials conducted from 2011 through 2013. In addition, different application methods of alternatives were also evaluated. Imidacloprid (Admire Pro), thiamethoxam (Actara), spinetoram (Radiant), and cyantraniliprole (Exirel) were as effective as aldicarb and phorate in suppressing thrips, but none of the insecticides significantly suppressed spotted wilt incidence. Nevertheless, greenhouse assays demonstrated that the same alternative insecticides were effective in suppressing thrips feeding and reducing TSWV transmission. Spotted wilt incidence in the greenhouse was more severe (∼80%) than in the field (5–25%). In general, field resistance to TSWV in cultivars only marginally influenced spotted wilt incidence. Results suggest that effective management of thrips using alternative insecticides and subsequent feeding reduction could improve yields under low to moderate virus pressure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0493</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-291X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jee/tov336</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26637534</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Entomological Society of America</publisher><subject>Animals ; Arachis - virology ; ARTHROPODS IN RELATION TO PLANT DISEASE ; Biomass ; Crop diseases ; Cultivars ; Foliage ; Greenhouses ; Herbivory ; Insect Vectors - virology ; Insecticides ; Legumes ; Organophosphates ; Peanuts ; Pest control ; Plant Diseases ; Population Density ; spotted wilt ; Thysanoptera - virology ; tobacco thrips ; Tomatoes ; Tospovirus - isolation & purification ; vector and disease management</subject><ispartof>Journal of economic entomology, 2016-04, Vol.109 (2), p.544-557</ispartof><rights>The Authors 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com journals.permissions@oup.com</rights><rights>The Authors 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com 2015</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press, UK Apr 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b378t-b958661b9815ac50ac7d12569e45200141f1882afd837630b94e9ca6b8df3c3a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b378t-b958661b9815ac50ac7d12569e45200141f1882afd837630b94e9ca6b8df3c3a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26637534$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Marasigan, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toews, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kemerait, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abney, M. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Culbreath, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Srinivasan, R</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of Alternatives to Carbamate and Organophosphate Insecticides Against Thrips and Tomato Spotted Wilt Virus in Peanut Production</title><title>Journal of economic entomology</title><addtitle>J Econ Entomol</addtitle><description>Thrips are important pests of peanut. They cause severe feeding injuries on peanut foliage in the early season. They also transmit Tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV), which causes spotted wilt disease. At-plant insecticides and cultivars that exhibit field resistance to TSWV are often used to manage thrips and spotted wilt disease. Historically, peanut growers used the broad-spectrum insecticides aldicarb (IRAC class 1A; Temik) and phorate (IRAC class 1B; Thimet) for managing thrips and thereby reducing TSWV transmission. Aldicarb has not been produced since 2011 and its usage in peanut will be legally phased out in 2018; therefore, identification of alternative chemistries is critical for thrips and spotted wilt management. Here, eight alternative insecticides, with known thrips activity, were evaluated in field trials conducted from 2011 through 2013. In addition, different application methods of alternatives were also evaluated. Imidacloprid (Admire Pro), thiamethoxam (Actara), spinetoram (Radiant), and cyantraniliprole (Exirel) were as effective as aldicarb and phorate in suppressing thrips, but none of the insecticides significantly suppressed spotted wilt incidence. Nevertheless, greenhouse assays demonstrated that the same alternative insecticides were effective in suppressing thrips feeding and reducing TSWV transmission. Spotted wilt incidence in the greenhouse was more severe (∼80%) than in the field (5–25%). In general, field resistance to TSWV in cultivars only marginally influenced spotted wilt incidence. Results suggest that effective management of thrips using alternative insecticides and subsequent feeding reduction could improve yields under low to moderate virus pressure.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Arachis - virology</subject><subject>ARTHROPODS IN RELATION TO PLANT DISEASE</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Crop diseases</subject><subject>Cultivars</subject><subject>Foliage</subject><subject>Greenhouses</subject><subject>Herbivory</subject><subject>Insect Vectors - virology</subject><subject>Insecticides</subject><subject>Legumes</subject><subject>Organophosphates</subject><subject>Peanuts</subject><subject>Pest control</subject><subject>Plant Diseases</subject><subject>Population Density</subject><subject>spotted wilt</subject><subject>Thysanoptera - virology</subject><subject>tobacco thrips</subject><subject>Tomatoes</subject><subject>Tospovirus - isolation & purification</subject><subject>vector and disease management</subject><issn>0022-0493</issn><issn>1938-291X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90U9LHDEYBvBQKnW1XvoBSqAUpDCaTGayyXFZrAqCgtvW25DJZNwss3mn-bPQr-CnNutuPXjwFBJ-ecKbB6EvlJxRItn5ypjzCBvG-Ac0oZKJopT04SOaEFKWBakkO0RHIawIobyk5BM6LDln05pVE_R0sVFDUtGCw9Dj2RCNd3m7MQFHwHPlW7VW0WDlOnzrH5WDcQlhXG7Prl0wOlptu6xnj8q6EPFi6e0YXvwC8lXA9yPEaDr8xw4R_7Y-BWwdvjPKpYjvPHRJb9__jA56NQRzsl-P0a-fF4v5VXFze3k9n90ULZuKWLSyFpzTVgpaK10TpacdLWsuTVWXecSK9lSIUvWdYFPOSCsrI7Xireh6pplix-h0lzt6-JtMiM3aBm2GQTkDKTRU5BDGa04y_faGriDl_xm2qpYVkYRVWf3YKe0hBG_6ZvR2rfy_hpJm21CTG2p2DWX8dR-Z2rXpXun_SjL4vgOQxveD9mO0FsCZ9-gz6tOohg</recordid><startdate>20160401</startdate><enddate>20160401</enddate><creator>Marasigan, K</creator><creator>Toews, M</creator><creator>Kemerait, R</creator><creator>Abney, M. R</creator><creator>Culbreath, A</creator><creator>Srinivasan, R</creator><general>Entomological Society of America</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160401</creationdate><title>Evaluation of Alternatives to Carbamate and Organophosphate Insecticides Against Thrips and Tomato Spotted Wilt Virus in Peanut Production</title><author>Marasigan, K ; Toews, M ; Kemerait, R ; Abney, M. R ; Culbreath, A ; Srinivasan, R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b378t-b958661b9815ac50ac7d12569e45200141f1882afd837630b94e9ca6b8df3c3a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Arachis - virology</topic><topic>ARTHROPODS IN RELATION TO PLANT DISEASE</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Crop diseases</topic><topic>Cultivars</topic><topic>Foliage</topic><topic>Greenhouses</topic><topic>Herbivory</topic><topic>Insect Vectors - virology</topic><topic>Insecticides</topic><topic>Legumes</topic><topic>Organophosphates</topic><topic>Peanuts</topic><topic>Pest control</topic><topic>Plant Diseases</topic><topic>Population Density</topic><topic>spotted wilt</topic><topic>Thysanoptera - virology</topic><topic>tobacco thrips</topic><topic>Tomatoes</topic><topic>Tospovirus - isolation & purification</topic><topic>vector and disease management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Marasigan, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toews, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kemerait, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abney, M. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Culbreath, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Srinivasan, R</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of economic entomology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Marasigan, K</au><au>Toews, M</au><au>Kemerait, R</au><au>Abney, M. R</au><au>Culbreath, A</au><au>Srinivasan, R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of Alternatives to Carbamate and Organophosphate Insecticides Against Thrips and Tomato Spotted Wilt Virus in Peanut Production</atitle><jtitle>Journal of economic entomology</jtitle><addtitle>J Econ Entomol</addtitle><date>2016-04-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>109</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>544</spage><epage>557</epage><pages>544-557</pages><issn>0022-0493</issn><eissn>1938-291X</eissn><abstract>Thrips are important pests of peanut. They cause severe feeding injuries on peanut foliage in the early season. They also transmit Tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV), which causes spotted wilt disease. At-plant insecticides and cultivars that exhibit field resistance to TSWV are often used to manage thrips and spotted wilt disease. Historically, peanut growers used the broad-spectrum insecticides aldicarb (IRAC class 1A; Temik) and phorate (IRAC class 1B; Thimet) for managing thrips and thereby reducing TSWV transmission. Aldicarb has not been produced since 2011 and its usage in peanut will be legally phased out in 2018; therefore, identification of alternative chemistries is critical for thrips and spotted wilt management. Here, eight alternative insecticides, with known thrips activity, were evaluated in field trials conducted from 2011 through 2013. In addition, different application methods of alternatives were also evaluated. Imidacloprid (Admire Pro), thiamethoxam (Actara), spinetoram (Radiant), and cyantraniliprole (Exirel) were as effective as aldicarb and phorate in suppressing thrips, but none of the insecticides significantly suppressed spotted wilt incidence. Nevertheless, greenhouse assays demonstrated that the same alternative insecticides were effective in suppressing thrips feeding and reducing TSWV transmission. Spotted wilt incidence in the greenhouse was more severe (∼80%) than in the field (5–25%). In general, field resistance to TSWV in cultivars only marginally influenced spotted wilt incidence. Results suggest that effective management of thrips using alternative insecticides and subsequent feeding reduction could improve yields under low to moderate virus pressure.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Entomological Society of America</pub><pmid>26637534</pmid><doi>10.1093/jee/tov336</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-0493 |
ispartof | Journal of economic entomology, 2016-04, Vol.109 (2), p.544-557 |
issn | 0022-0493 1938-291X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1801436560 |
source | Oxford Journals Online |
subjects | Animals Arachis - virology ARTHROPODS IN RELATION TO PLANT DISEASE Biomass Crop diseases Cultivars Foliage Greenhouses Herbivory Insect Vectors - virology Insecticides Legumes Organophosphates Peanuts Pest control Plant Diseases Population Density spotted wilt Thysanoptera - virology tobacco thrips Tomatoes Tospovirus - isolation & purification vector and disease management |
title | Evaluation of Alternatives to Carbamate and Organophosphate Insecticides Against Thrips and Tomato Spotted Wilt Virus in Peanut Production |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T12%3A22%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20Alternatives%20to%20Carbamate%20and%20Organophosphate%20Insecticides%20Against%20Thrips%20and%20Tomato%20Spotted%20Wilt%20Virus%20in%20Peanut%20Production&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20economic%20entomology&rft.au=Marasigan,%20K&rft.date=2016-04-01&rft.volume=109&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=544&rft.epage=557&rft.pages=544-557&rft.issn=0022-0493&rft.eissn=1938-291X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jee/tov336&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4303472531%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b378t-b958661b9815ac50ac7d12569e45200141f1882afd837630b94e9ca6b8df3c3a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1859409034&rft_id=info:pmid/26637534&rft_oup_id=10.1093/jee/tov336&rfr_iscdi=true |