Loading…
Directionality in fruit dispersal models for anemochorous forest trees
Despite the progress which has been achieved in modelling the seed dispersal of plants by ‘seed shadow models’, the accuracy of the predictions made by those models still needs improvement, especially in regard to long distance dispersal. One assumption in recent parameterization techniques of seed...
Saved in:
Published in: | Ecological modelling 2004-12, Vol.179 (4), p.487-498 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Despite the progress which has been achieved in modelling the seed dispersal of plants by ‘seed shadow models’, the accuracy of the predictions made by those models still needs improvement, especially in regard to long distance dispersal. One assumption in recent parameterization techniques of seed shadow models is isotropy of the distribution around the mother tree. However, published data show non-isotropic features of that distribution. Non-isotropy—or directionality—is understood here as any relevant heterogeneity in seed density by azimuth directions in regard to the mother trees position.
We present an approach to estimate the degree of directionality in seed dispersal data by implementing azimuth directions in seed shadow models. This leads to anisotropic models. In all three of the datasets we tested (seed dispersion of
Fraxinus excelsior L. and
Betula pendula Roth) the model predictions were improved by the anisotropic approach when compared to the isotropic one. However, to get proper estimations the number of seed traps must be high in relation to the number of seed trees.
The efficacy of dispersal in relation to available safe site area and seed production, taking directionality into account, was tested by comparing the predicted production of offspring of the non-isotropic model with that of the isotropic model in order to determine the relative advantage of non-isotropic dispersion. To do this we adapted a mean field approach of Geritz et al. [Oecologia 62 (1984) 219] to the two-dimensional model and ran several simulations. We found that when a medium directionality pattern in combination with larger values for mean dispersal distance is modelled, seed dispersal efficacy is high. In contrast, highly pronounced directionality patterns are less efficient, even if larger values of mean dispersal distances are modelled. The capacity to compensate for directionality with larger dispersal distances should occur mostly in species with far flying seeds and large habitat sizes. In contrary, directionality seems always at an evolutionary disadvantage in small habitats. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0304-3800 1872-7026 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2004.02.020 |