Loading…

Transthoracic Computed Tomography–Guided Lung Nodule Biopsy: Comparison of Core Needle and Fine Needle Aspiration Techniques

Abstract Purpose To determine if there is a statistically significant difference in the computed tomography (CT)–guided trans-thoracic needle biopsy diagnostic rate, complication rate, and degree of pathologist confidence in diagnosis between core needle biopsy (CNB) and fine needle aspiration biops...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Canadian Association of Radiologists journal 2016-08, Vol.67 (3), p.284-289
Main Authors: Sangha, Bippan S., MD, Hague, Cameron J., MD, Jessup, Jennifer, MD, O'Connor, Robert, MB, Mayo, John R., MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Purpose To determine if there is a statistically significant difference in the computed tomography (CT)–guided trans-thoracic needle biopsy diagnostic rate, complication rate, and degree of pathologist confidence in diagnosis between core needle biopsy (CNB) and fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB). Methods A retrospective cohort design was used to compare the diagnostic biopsy rate, diagnostic confidence, and biopsy-related complications of pneumothorax, chest tube placement, pulmonary hemorrhage, hemoptysis, admission to hospital, and length of stay between 251 transthoracic needle biopsies obtained via CNB (126) or FNAB (125). Complication rates were assessed using imaging and clinical follow-up. Final diagnosis was confirmed via surgical pathology or clinical follow-up over a period of up to 10 years. Results CNB provided diagnostic samples in 91% and FNA in 80% of biopsies, which was statistically significant ( P  
ISSN:0846-5371
1488-2361
DOI:10.1016/j.carj.2015.10.005