Loading…
Transthoracic Computed Tomography–Guided Lung Nodule Biopsy: Comparison of Core Needle and Fine Needle Aspiration Techniques
Abstract Purpose To determine if there is a statistically significant difference in the computed tomography (CT)–guided trans-thoracic needle biopsy diagnostic rate, complication rate, and degree of pathologist confidence in diagnosis between core needle biopsy (CNB) and fine needle aspiration biops...
Saved in:
Published in: | Canadian Association of Radiologists journal 2016-08, Vol.67 (3), p.284-289 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Abstract Purpose To determine if there is a statistically significant difference in the computed tomography (CT)–guided trans-thoracic needle biopsy diagnostic rate, complication rate, and degree of pathologist confidence in diagnosis between core needle biopsy (CNB) and fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB). Methods A retrospective cohort design was used to compare the diagnostic biopsy rate, diagnostic confidence, and biopsy-related complications of pneumothorax, chest tube placement, pulmonary hemorrhage, hemoptysis, admission to hospital, and length of stay between 251 transthoracic needle biopsies obtained via CNB (126) or FNAB (125). Complication rates were assessed using imaging and clinical follow-up. Final diagnosis was confirmed via surgical pathology or clinical follow-up over a period of up to 10 years. Results CNB provided diagnostic samples in 91% and FNA in 80% of biopsies, which was statistically significant ( P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0846-5371 1488-2361 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.carj.2015.10.005 |