Loading…

Forecasting CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 Risk with a Global/Local Fusion Model of CYP450 Inhibition

This work presents a method to utilize the ever‐expanding corporate collections of CYP450 inhibition data to forecast the future risk of compounds not yet synthesized. The global/local fusion method differs from existing QSAR methods, in that each prediction is derived from a custom‐built QSAR model...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Molecular informatics 2010-01, Vol.29 (1-2), p.127-141
Main Authors: Ewing, Todd, Feher, Miklos
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This work presents a method to utilize the ever‐expanding corporate collections of CYP450 inhibition data to forecast the future risk of compounds not yet synthesized. The global/local fusion method differs from existing QSAR methods, in that each prediction is derived from a custom‐built QSAR model, constructed on‐the‐fly, using a customized training set assembled for each prediction. It uses a consensus of global and local descriptor‐based models along with pharmacophore‐based fingerprint similarity to form a prediction and to assess the uncertainty of the prediction on a case‐by‐case basis. We also present a new forward prediction testing and validation scheme in which the corporate dataset is split chronologically, and predictions for a molecule are based on the pool of existing data available before the molecule is registered and tested. The validation accuracy of the CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 models approaches the underlying accuracy of the data, about 0.4 log IC50 units standard error (or nearly 70% r2 correlation) for the most confident predictions, and extends to about 0.6 log IC50 units standard error (or under 30% r2 correlation) for the least confident predictions. As a classification model for CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 activity, the validation accuracy is about 79% for predicted actives and 85% for predicted inactives, which is consistent with existing published models.
ISSN:1868-1743
1868-1751
DOI:10.1002/minf.200900040