Loading…

AT-05 PHASE II STUDY OF IFOSFAMIDE, CARBOPLATIN, AND ETOPOSIDE INPATIENTS WITH A FIRST RECURRENCE OF GLIOBLASTOMA MULTIFORME

OBJECTIVE: The prognosis of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) remains unsatisfactory. The authors conducted a Phase II study of ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide (ICE) for a first recurrence of GBM to determine whether it prolonged a patient's good-quality life. METHODS: This trial w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Neuro-oncology (Charlottesville, Va.) Va.), 2014-11, Vol.16 (suppl 5), p.v9-v9
Main Authors: Aoki, T., Ueba, T., Miyatake, S.-I., Nozaki, K., Arakawa, Y., Miyamoto, S., Tsukahara, T., Matsutani, M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:OBJECTIVE: The prognosis of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) remains unsatisfactory. The authors conducted a Phase II study of ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide (ICE) for a first recurrence of GBM to determine whether it prolonged a patient's good-quality life. METHODS: This trial was an open-label, single-center Phase II study. Forty-two patients with a first GBM relapse after surgery followed by standard radiotherapy (60 Gy) and first-line temozolomide- or nimustine-based chemotherapy were eligible to participate. The primary end point was progression-free survival at 6 months after the ICE treatment (PFS-6), and secondary end points were response rate, toxicity, and overall survival. Chemotherapy consisted of ifosfamide (1000 mg/m2 on Days 1, 2, and 3), carboplatin (110 mg/m2 on Day 1), etoposide (100 mg/m2 on Days 1, 2, and 3), every 6 weeks. RESULTS: Progression-free survival at 6 months after ICE treatment was 35% (95% CI 22-50%). The median duration of PFS was 17 weeks (95% CI 10-24 weeks). The response rate was 25% (95% CI 9-34%). Adverse events were generally mild and consisted mainly of alopecia. CONCLUSIONS: This regimen was well tolerated and has some activity and could be one of the options for patients with recurrent GBM. (DOI: 10.3171/2009.5.JNS081738)
ISSN:1522-8517
1523-5866
DOI:10.1093/neuonc/nou237.5