The challenge for predicting bleeding events by assessing platelet reactivity following coronary stenting

• Published in: International journal of cardiology 2016-03, Vol.207, p.128-131
• Main Authors: Choi, Sun Young, Kim, Moo Hyun, Serebruany, Victor
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Bleeding; Blood Platelets - drug effects; Blood Platelets - metabolism; Cardiovascular; Clopidogrel; Coronary Artery Disease - blood; Coronary Artery Disease - diagnosis; Coronary Artery Disease - surgery; Coronary stenting; Cross-Sectional Studies; Drug-Eluting Stents - adverse effects; Drug-Eluting Stents - trends; Dual antiplatelet therapy; Female; Hemorrhage - blood; Hemorrhage - diagnosis; Hemorrhage - etiology; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Platelet Activation - drug effects; Platelet Activation - physiology; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors - administration & dosage; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors - adverse effects; Prasugrel; Prediction; Predictive Value of Tests; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists - administration & dosage; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists - adverse effects; Ticagrelor; VerifyNow assay
• ISSN: 0167-5273; 1874-1754
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.01.102

Abstract Background Predicting future bleeding events represents an unmet medical need that will ultimately improve outcomes during dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). Although low platelet reactivity (LPR) may be linked to bleeding, standardized and clinically validated threshold for reliable DAPT bleeding risk stratification is lacking. We sought to define the predictive value of LPR for future bleeding events in a large cohort of post-stenting single-center Korean patients. Methods Consecutive patients (n = 800) who underwent coronary interventions with drug-eluting stents were enrolled from March 2010 to October 2014. Among them, 699 (80%) were treated with 75 mg/daily clopidogrel, 93 (19%) with 10 mg/daily prasugrel, and 8 (1%) with 180 mg/daily ticagrelor, all on top of 100 mg/daily aspirin. Bleeding was assessed by BARC 2–5 scale, and events were collected for 1-year post stenting. Platelet reactivity on DAPT was measured by the VerifyNow P2 Y12 assay at 1 month following coronary intervention. Results There were a total of 18 (2.1%) bleeding events. The LPR value defined as ≤ 139 PRU (AUC: 0.867, p < 0.0001) was an independent predictor for bleeding (HR = 21.26, 95% CI: 6.19–73.0, p < 0.0001) by univariate analysis, and remains significant (HR = 11.49; 95% CI: 2.89–45.67, p < 0.0004) following multivariate analysis adjustment. However, the specificity (81.7%) and sensitivity (83.3%) of the test was low challenging the assay utility to predict bleeding. Conclusion Despite being an independent predictor for bleeding, LPR failed to reliably triage such patients due to low specificity and sensitivity of the test. There is an urgent need for a randomized trial with uniformed DAPT regimen, bleeding definition, and careful follow-up.