Loading…
A framework for simulating ultrasound imaging based on first order nonlinear pressure–velocity relations
•A set of first order nonlinear wave equations are derived.•The nonlinear pressure–velocity relation based simulation is presented.•The simulated results are compared to Field II, ASA and Abersim simulations.•The ultrasound channel data are simulated by the program. An ultrasound imaging framework m...
Saved in:
Published in: | Ultrasonics 2016-07, Vol.69, p.152-165 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | •A set of first order nonlinear wave equations are derived.•The nonlinear pressure–velocity relation based simulation is presented.•The simulated results are compared to Field II, ASA and Abersim simulations.•The ultrasound channel data are simulated by the program.
An ultrasound imaging framework modeled with the first order nonlinear pressure–velocity relations (NPVR) and implemented by a half-time staggered solution and pseudospectral method is presented in this paper. The framework is capable of simulating linear and nonlinear ultrasound propagation and reflections in a heterogeneous medium with different sound speeds and densities. It can be initialized with arbitrary focus, excitation and apodization for multiple individual channels in both 2D and 3D spatial fields. The simulated channel data can be generated using this framework, and ultrasound image can be obtained by beamforming the simulated channel data. Various results simulated by different algorithms are illustrated for comparisons. The root mean square (RMS) errors for each compared pulses are calculated. The linear propagation is validated by an angular spectrum approach (ASA) with a RMS error of 3% at the focal point for a 2D field, and Field II with RMS errors of 0.8% and 1.5% at the electronic and the elevation focuses for 3D fields, respectively. The accuracy for the NPVR based nonlinear propagation is investigated by comparing with the Abersim simulation for pulsed fields and with the nonlinear ASA for monochromatic fields. The RMS errors of the nonlinear pulses calculated by the NPVR and Abersim are respectively 2.4%, 7.4%, 17.6% and 36.6% corresponding to initial pressure amplitudes of 50kPa, 200kPa, 500kPa and 1MPa at the transducer. By increasing the sampling frequency for the strong nonlinearity, the RMS error for 1MPa initial pressure amplitude is reduced from 36.6% to 27.3%. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0041-624X 1874-9968 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ultras.2016.03.015 |