Loading…

A practical finite difference method for the three-dimensional Black–Scholes equation

•We develop the numerical method for pricing of the three-asset ELS options.•We use the operator splitting method (OSM) on non-equidistant grid.•We compare the OSM with the Monte Carlo simulation (MCS).•The OSM is more efficient and stable than MCS for calculating the Greeks. In this paper, we devel...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European journal of operational research 2016-07, Vol.252 (1), p.183-190
Main Authors: Kim, Junseok, Kim, Taekkeun, Jo, Jaehyun, Choi, Yongho, Lee, Seunggyu, Hwang, Hyeongseok, Yoo, Minhyun, Jeong, Darae
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•We develop the numerical method for pricing of the three-asset ELS options.•We use the operator splitting method (OSM) on non-equidistant grid.•We compare the OSM with the Monte Carlo simulation (MCS).•The OSM is more efficient and stable than MCS for calculating the Greeks. In this paper, we develop a fast and accurate numerical method for pricing of the three-asset equity-linked securities options. The option pricing model is based on the Black–Scholes partial differential equation. The model is discretized by using a non-uniform finite difference method and the resulting discrete equations are solved by using an operator splitting method. For fast and accurate calculation, we put more grid points near the singularity of the nonsmooth payoff function. To demonstrate the accuracy and efficiency of the proposed numerical method, we compare the results of the method with those from Monte Carlo simulation in terms of computational cost and accuracy. The numerical results show that the cost of the proposed method is comparable to that of the Monte Carlo simulation and it provides more stable hedging parameters such as the Greeks.
ISSN:0377-2217
1872-6860
DOI:10.1016/j.ejor.2015.12.012