Loading…

Perioperative and oncologic outcomes of minimally invasive liver resection for colorectal metastases: A case–control study of 130 patients

Background Our aim was to compare the perioperative and oncologic outcomes of open liver resection and minimally invasive liver resection in the management of colorectal liver metastases. Methods Patients who underwent minimally invasive liver resection for colorectal liver metastases between Januar...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Surgery 2016-10, Vol.160 (4), p.1097-1103
Main Authors: Karagkounis, Georgios, MD, Akyuz, Muhammet, MD, Guerron, Alfredo Daniel, MD, Yazici, Pinar, MD, Aucejo, Federico N., MD, Quintini, Cristiano, MD, Miller, Charles M., MD, Vogt, David P., MD, Fung, John J., MD, PhD, Berber, Eren, MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background Our aim was to compare the perioperative and oncologic outcomes of open liver resection and minimally invasive liver resection in the management of colorectal liver metastases. Methods Patients who underwent minimally invasive liver resection for colorectal liver metastases between January 2006 and June 2015 at a single center were identified and matched by extent of resection to consecutive open liver resection patients from the same period. Clinicopathologic characteristics, perioperative data, recurrence, and survival outcomes were collected and analyzed based on intention-to-treat. Results Sixty-five patients underwent minimally invasive liver resection during this period and were matched to 65 consecutive open liver resection patients, with similar baseline demographic, tumor, and chemotherapy parameters. Conversion to open occurred in 5 (7.7%) minimally invasive liver resection patients. R0 resection rates and operative times were comparable, but the estimated blood loss was less in the minimally invasive liver resection group (median 200 mL vs 400 mL, P  
ISSN:0039-6060
1532-7361
DOI:10.1016/j.surg.2016.04.043