A Detection Scheme for Paraquat Poisoning: Validation and a Five-Year Experience in Australia

• Published in: Journal of analytical toxicology 2001-09, Vol.25 (6), p.456-460
• Main Authors: Taylor, Paul J., Salm, Paul, Pillans, Peter I.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Biological and medical sciences; Calibration; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid - methods; False Positive Reactions; Herbicides - blood; Herbicides - poisoning; Herbicides - urine; Humans; Medical sciences; Paraquat - blood; Paraquat - poisoning; Paraquat - urine; Pesticides, fertilizers and other agrochemicals toxicology; Poisoning - diagnosis; Reference Values; Sensitivity and Specificity; Toxicology
• ISSN: 0146-4760; 1945-2403
• DOI: 10.1093/jat/25.6.456

We report the validation of a quantitative method for paraquat in plasma and urine using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with ultraviolet detection (260 nm). Furthermore, we illustrate the use of this method in the clinic (over five years), in conjunction with a qualitative urine paraquat screen. Urine or plasma sample (1 mL) preparation was performed in duplicate using C18 solid-phase extraction. Chromatographic separation was achieved on a Zorbax RX-Silica column (250 × 4.6-mm i.d.). The mobile phase consisted of 96% sodium chloride (5 g/L) and 4% acetonitrile (pH 2.2) pumped at 1.0 mL/min. Using a single-point calibration (1.0 mg/L), the method was found to be linear from 0.1 to 5.0 mg/L. The accuracy and imprecision of the method, over the linear range and for plasma and urine, were 94.7–104.9% and ≤ 12.2%, respectively. The limit of quantitation for both matrices was 0.1 mg/L. The absolute recovery of paraquat from plasma and urine was 79.9 ± 5.3% and 88.2 ± 5.3%, respectively. From January 1995 to February 2000, 47 qualitative urine paraquat screens were requested throughout Australia. Nine screens were positive, and eight were confirmed to have paraquat present by our HPLC method. One sample was not analyzed by HPLC because the patient died prior to analysis. Thus, no false-positive results were reported for the qualitative urine screen. An additional 11 samples were referred for patients with positive screens from other sites for HPLC confirmation. The presence of paraquat was confirmed in nine of these samples. In conclusion, a qualitative urine screen combined with our validated HPLC confirmation is an effective protocol for assessing suspected cases of paraquat poisoning.