The challenge of sustainable building renovation: assessment of current criteria and future outlook

• Published in: Journal of cleaner production 2016-06, Vol.123, p.88-100
• Main Authors: Pombo, Olatz, Rivela, Beatriz, Neila, Javier
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Assessments; Buildings; Housing; Housing renovation; Life cycle assessment; Life cycle cost; Renovation; Retrofitting; Strategy; Sustainability
• ISSN: 0959-6526; 1879-1786
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.137

The building sector is one of the key consumers of energy worldwide. Thus, the retrofitting of existing buildings provides excellent opportunities for reducing energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. This paper presents a critical review of the research undertaken on housing retrofits and discusses the approaches driving the assessment of energy-efficiency measures. It is clear from the existing literature that many retrofitting strategies are quite similar in their approaches, the most common of these being passive strategies such as insulation of the envelope, replacement of windows, and air sealing. However, the assessment methodologies differ broadly and widely, which restricts a comparison of the results across various studies. This current state of the art review highlights the need to apply a life cycle approach in order to find the optimal retrofitting solutions, and to identify the real improvement potential of housing renovation. Life cycle assessment and life cycle cost methodologies have been analyzed by discussing the existing limitations, which can be mitigated by sensitivity analysis. Finally, whilst social impacts were addressed in a few studies, life cycle social assessment was not conducted in any of the papers reviewed. [Display omitted] •Evaluation methods as well as energy saving measures on housing renovation are described.•Environmental, economic and multi-criteria assessment methodologies are compared.•Key methodological aspects on sustainability assessment methods used in housing renovation are identified and analyzed.•A strong need for methodological harmonization considering environmental, economic and social impacts is found.