Loading…

Mesenchymal stem cells have antifibrotic effects on transforming growth factor‐β1‐stimulated vocal fold fibroblasts

Objectives/Hypothesis Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) hold therapeutic promise for vocal fold scar, yet the precise mechanism(s) underlying tissue level changes remain unclear. We hypothesize that MSCs interact with native fibroblasts to favorably affect healing. Furthermore, we hypothesize that these...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Laryngoscope 2017-01, Vol.127 (1), p.E35-E41
Main Authors: Hiwatashi, Nao, Bing, Renjie, Kraja, Iv, Branski, Ryan C.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objectives/Hypothesis Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) hold therapeutic promise for vocal fold scar, yet the precise mechanism(s) underlying tissue level changes remain unclear. We hypothesize that MSCs interact with native fibroblasts to favorably affect healing. Furthermore, we hypothesize that these interactions vary based on MSC source. Methods Vocal fold fibroblasts (VFFs), adipose‐derived stem cells, and bone marrow‐derived stem cells (BMSCs) were extracted from Sprague‐Dawley rats; and a coculture model was employed culturing VFFs ± transforming growth factor (TGF‐β1) (10 ng/mL) ± MSCs. Monoculture MSCs were also prepared as a control. Both extracellular matrix (ECM) and components of the TGF‐β signaling pathway were analyzed via polymerase chain reaction and western blotting. Results Significantly decreased TGF‐β1 mRNA and α‐smooth muscle actin protein was observed in VFFs in response to TGF‐β1 in the coculture with both MSCs (P < 0.05, P < 0.01). BMSCs significantly downregulated collagen I (P < 0.05), collagen III (P < 0.05), Smad3 (P < 0.01), and TGF‐β1 receptor I (P < 0.01) mRNA in VFFs. Hyaluronic synthase‐1 and 2 increased in cocultured BMSCs when compared with monocultured BMSCs at baseline and in response to TGF‐β1 (P < 0.01). Conclusion MSCs had a favorable effect on ECM regulation as well as suppression of TGF‐β1 signaling in VFF. Bidirectional paracrine signaling was also observed as VFFs altered ECM regulation in MSCs. These data provide insight into the regenerative effects of MSCs and provide a foundation for clinical application. Level of Evidence NA Laryngoscope, 127:E35–E41, 2017
ISSN:0023-852X
1531-4995
DOI:10.1002/lary.26121