Loading…
A randomized clinical trial comparing basal insulin peglispro and insulin glargine, in combination with prandial insulin lispro, in patients with type 1 diabetes: IMAGINE 1
Aims The primary objective was to demonstrate that basal insulin peglispro (BIL) was non‐inferior compared with insulin glargine (GL) for haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at 26 weeks with a non‐inferiority margin of 0.4%. Materials and Methods IMAGINE 1 was a Phase 3, open‐label, parallel‐arm study conducted...
Saved in:
Published in: | Diabetes, obesity & metabolism obesity & metabolism, 2016-10, Vol.18 (S2), p.25-33 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Aims
The primary objective was to demonstrate that basal insulin peglispro (BIL) was non‐inferior compared with insulin glargine (GL) for haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at 26 weeks with a non‐inferiority margin of 0.4%.
Materials and Methods
IMAGINE 1 was a Phase 3, open‐label, parallel‐arm study conducted in nine countries. Adults with type 1 diabetes (n = 455) were randomized (2:1) to bedtime BIL or GL in combination with prandial insulin lispro for 78 weeks, with a primary endpoint of 26 weeks. An electronic diary facilitated data capture and insulin dosing calculations for intensive insulin management.
Results
At 26 weeks, mean HbA1c was 7.06% ± 0.04% and 7.43% ± 0.06% for patients assigned to BIL (N = 295) and GL (N = 160), respectively (difference ‐0.37% [95% CI: −0.50 to −0.23], P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1462-8902 1463-1326 |
DOI: | 10.1111/dom.12738 |