Loading…

A randomized clinical trial comparing basal insulin peglispro and insulin glargine, in combination with prandial insulin lispro, in patients with type 1 diabetes: IMAGINE 1

Aims The primary objective was to demonstrate that basal insulin peglispro (BIL) was non‐inferior compared with insulin glargine (GL) for haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at 26 weeks with a non‐inferiority margin of 0.4%. Materials and Methods IMAGINE 1 was a Phase 3, open‐label, parallel‐arm study conducted...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Diabetes, obesity & metabolism obesity & metabolism, 2016-10, Vol.18 (S2), p.25-33
Main Authors: Garg, S., Dreyer, M., Jinnouchi, H., Mou, J., Qu, Y., Hartman, M. L., Rosilio, M., Jacober, S. J., Bastyr III, E. J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Aims The primary objective was to demonstrate that basal insulin peglispro (BIL) was non‐inferior compared with insulin glargine (GL) for haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at 26 weeks with a non‐inferiority margin of 0.4%. Materials and Methods IMAGINE 1 was a Phase 3, open‐label, parallel‐arm study conducted in nine countries. Adults with type 1 diabetes (n = 455) were randomized (2:1) to bedtime BIL or GL in combination with prandial insulin lispro for 78 weeks, with a primary endpoint of 26 weeks. An electronic diary facilitated data capture and insulin dosing calculations for intensive insulin management. Results At 26 weeks, mean HbA1c was 7.06% ± 0.04% and 7.43% ± 0.06% for patients assigned to BIL (N = 295) and GL (N = 160), respectively (difference ‐0.37% [95% CI: −0.50 to −0.23], P 
ISSN:1462-8902
1463-1326
DOI:10.1111/dom.12738