Loading…

Quality guidelines for oral drug candidates: dose, solubility and lipophilicity

[Display omitted] •Experimental properties of GSK's oral portfolio were compared with marketed drugs.•Properties were dose, solubility and the property forecast index (chromatographic Log D + aromatic ring count).•A model combining property cutoffs differentiated GSK's candidates from oral...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Drug discovery today 2016-10, Vol.21 (10), p.1719-1727
Main Authors: Bayliss, Martin K., Butler, James, Feldman, Paul L., Green, Darren V.S., Leeson, Paul D., Palovich, Michael R., Taylor, Anthony J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-f0b93e7115094722d711aa187a48815e4e8ec4f0f113a94eb184a276d97e00c73
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-f0b93e7115094722d711aa187a48815e4e8ec4f0f113a94eb184a276d97e00c73
container_end_page 1727
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1719
container_title Drug discovery today
container_volume 21
creator Bayliss, Martin K.
Butler, James
Feldman, Paul L.
Green, Darren V.S.
Leeson, Paul D.
Palovich, Michael R.
Taylor, Anthony J.
description [Display omitted] •Experimental properties of GSK's oral portfolio were compared with marketed drugs.•Properties were dose, solubility and the property forecast index (chromatographic Log D + aromatic ring count).•A model combining property cutoffs differentiated GSK's candidates from oral drugs.•The model provides guidance for seeking and selecting oral clinical candidates. In an attempt to seek increased understanding of compound attributes that influence successful drug pipeline progression, GlaxoSmithKline's portfolio of oral candidates was compared with reference sets of marketed oral drugs. The approach differs from other attrition studies by explicitly focusing on choosing ‘the right compound’ by applying relevant, experimentally derived properties. The analysis led to four proposed compound quality categories, created by combining specific criteria for three measures: dose, solubility and the property forecast index, a composite measure of lipophilicity using chromatographically determined LogD and aromaticity. The ‘three properties’ provide benchmarked guidelines for project teams to use when seeking and selecting clinical candidates, because they reflect the property distribution of marketed oral drugs.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.drudis.2016.07.007
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1826724140</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1359644616302574</els_id><sourcerecordid>1826724140</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-f0b93e7115094722d711aa187a48815e4e8ec4f0f113a94eb184a276d97e00c73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF9PwyAUxYnROJ1-A2N49MFWoLS0PpiYxX_JksVEnwmF28nSlQqtyb69zE0ffbr3cs_hwA-hC0pSSmhxs0qNH40NKYtTSkRKiDhAJ7QUZZKXGTuMfZZXScF5MUGnIawIoazKi2M0YYKzLBP0BC1eR9XaYYOXozXQ2g4CbpzHzqsWx4Al1qoz1qgBwi02LsA1Dq4da_vjijvc2t71H3HW8eQMHTWqDXC-r1P0_vjwNntO5ounl9n9PNFZwYakIXWVgaA0JxUXjJnYKhXfrnhZ0hw4lKB5QxpKM1VxqGnJFROFqQQQokU2RVe7e3vvPkcIg1zboKFtVQduDJKWrBCMU06ilO-k2rsQPDSy93at_EZSIrco5UruUMotSkmEjCij7XKfMNZrMH-mX3ZRcLcTQPznlwUvg7bQaTDWgx6kcfb_hG-YM4al</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1826724140</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quality guidelines for oral drug candidates: dose, solubility and lipophilicity</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Bayliss, Martin K. ; Butler, James ; Feldman, Paul L. ; Green, Darren V.S. ; Leeson, Paul D. ; Palovich, Michael R. ; Taylor, Anthony J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bayliss, Martin K. ; Butler, James ; Feldman, Paul L. ; Green, Darren V.S. ; Leeson, Paul D. ; Palovich, Michael R. ; Taylor, Anthony J.</creatorcontrib><description>[Display omitted] •Experimental properties of GSK's oral portfolio were compared with marketed drugs.•Properties were dose, solubility and the property forecast index (chromatographic Log D + aromatic ring count).•A model combining property cutoffs differentiated GSK's candidates from oral drugs.•The model provides guidance for seeking and selecting oral clinical candidates. In an attempt to seek increased understanding of compound attributes that influence successful drug pipeline progression, GlaxoSmithKline's portfolio of oral candidates was compared with reference sets of marketed oral drugs. The approach differs from other attrition studies by explicitly focusing on choosing ‘the right compound’ by applying relevant, experimentally derived properties. The analysis led to four proposed compound quality categories, created by combining specific criteria for three measures: dose, solubility and the property forecast index, a composite measure of lipophilicity using chromatographically determined LogD and aromaticity. The ‘three properties’ provide benchmarked guidelines for project teams to use when seeking and selecting clinical candidates, because they reflect the property distribution of marketed oral drugs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1359-6446</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-5832</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2016.07.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27423371</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Administration, Oral ; Animals ; Drug Discovery ; Humans ; Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions ; Pharmaceutical Preparations - administration &amp; dosage ; Pharmaceutical Preparations - chemistry ; Pharmaceutical Preparations - metabolism ; Solubility</subject><ispartof>Drug discovery today, 2016-10, Vol.21 (10), p.1719-1727</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-f0b93e7115094722d711aa187a48815e4e8ec4f0f113a94eb184a276d97e00c73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-f0b93e7115094722d711aa187a48815e4e8ec4f0f113a94eb184a276d97e00c73</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2425-3091</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27423371$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bayliss, Martin K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butler, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feldman, Paul L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Darren V.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leeson, Paul D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palovich, Michael R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Anthony J.</creatorcontrib><title>Quality guidelines for oral drug candidates: dose, solubility and lipophilicity</title><title>Drug discovery today</title><addtitle>Drug Discov Today</addtitle><description>[Display omitted] •Experimental properties of GSK's oral portfolio were compared with marketed drugs.•Properties were dose, solubility and the property forecast index (chromatographic Log D + aromatic ring count).•A model combining property cutoffs differentiated GSK's candidates from oral drugs.•The model provides guidance for seeking and selecting oral clinical candidates. In an attempt to seek increased understanding of compound attributes that influence successful drug pipeline progression, GlaxoSmithKline's portfolio of oral candidates was compared with reference sets of marketed oral drugs. The approach differs from other attrition studies by explicitly focusing on choosing ‘the right compound’ by applying relevant, experimentally derived properties. The analysis led to four proposed compound quality categories, created by combining specific criteria for three measures: dose, solubility and the property forecast index, a composite measure of lipophilicity using chromatographically determined LogD and aromaticity. The ‘three properties’ provide benchmarked guidelines for project teams to use when seeking and selecting clinical candidates, because they reflect the property distribution of marketed oral drugs.</description><subject>Administration, Oral</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Drug Discovery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical Preparations - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical Preparations - chemistry</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical Preparations - metabolism</subject><subject>Solubility</subject><issn>1359-6446</issn><issn>1878-5832</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kF9PwyAUxYnROJ1-A2N49MFWoLS0PpiYxX_JksVEnwmF28nSlQqtyb69zE0ffbr3cs_hwA-hC0pSSmhxs0qNH40NKYtTSkRKiDhAJ7QUZZKXGTuMfZZXScF5MUGnIawIoazKi2M0YYKzLBP0BC1eR9XaYYOXozXQ2g4CbpzHzqsWx4Al1qoz1qgBwi02LsA1Dq4da_vjijvc2t71H3HW8eQMHTWqDXC-r1P0_vjwNntO5ounl9n9PNFZwYakIXWVgaA0JxUXjJnYKhXfrnhZ0hw4lKB5QxpKM1VxqGnJFROFqQQQokU2RVe7e3vvPkcIg1zboKFtVQduDJKWrBCMU06ilO-k2rsQPDSy93at_EZSIrco5UruUMotSkmEjCij7XKfMNZrMH-mX3ZRcLcTQPznlwUvg7bQaTDWgx6kcfb_hG-YM4al</recordid><startdate>201610</startdate><enddate>201610</enddate><creator>Bayliss, Martin K.</creator><creator>Butler, James</creator><creator>Feldman, Paul L.</creator><creator>Green, Darren V.S.</creator><creator>Leeson, Paul D.</creator><creator>Palovich, Michael R.</creator><creator>Taylor, Anthony J.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2425-3091</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201610</creationdate><title>Quality guidelines for oral drug candidates: dose, solubility and lipophilicity</title><author>Bayliss, Martin K. ; Butler, James ; Feldman, Paul L. ; Green, Darren V.S. ; Leeson, Paul D. ; Palovich, Michael R. ; Taylor, Anthony J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-f0b93e7115094722d711aa187a48815e4e8ec4f0f113a94eb184a276d97e00c73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Administration, Oral</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Drug Discovery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical Preparations - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical Preparations - chemistry</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical Preparations - metabolism</topic><topic>Solubility</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bayliss, Martin K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butler, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feldman, Paul L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Darren V.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leeson, Paul D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palovich, Michael R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Anthony J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Drug discovery today</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bayliss, Martin K.</au><au>Butler, James</au><au>Feldman, Paul L.</au><au>Green, Darren V.S.</au><au>Leeson, Paul D.</au><au>Palovich, Michael R.</au><au>Taylor, Anthony J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quality guidelines for oral drug candidates: dose, solubility and lipophilicity</atitle><jtitle>Drug discovery today</jtitle><addtitle>Drug Discov Today</addtitle><date>2016-10</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1719</spage><epage>1727</epage><pages>1719-1727</pages><issn>1359-6446</issn><eissn>1878-5832</eissn><abstract>[Display omitted] •Experimental properties of GSK's oral portfolio were compared with marketed drugs.•Properties were dose, solubility and the property forecast index (chromatographic Log D + aromatic ring count).•A model combining property cutoffs differentiated GSK's candidates from oral drugs.•The model provides guidance for seeking and selecting oral clinical candidates. In an attempt to seek increased understanding of compound attributes that influence successful drug pipeline progression, GlaxoSmithKline's portfolio of oral candidates was compared with reference sets of marketed oral drugs. The approach differs from other attrition studies by explicitly focusing on choosing ‘the right compound’ by applying relevant, experimentally derived properties. The analysis led to four proposed compound quality categories, created by combining specific criteria for three measures: dose, solubility and the property forecast index, a composite measure of lipophilicity using chromatographically determined LogD and aromaticity. The ‘three properties’ provide benchmarked guidelines for project teams to use when seeking and selecting clinical candidates, because they reflect the property distribution of marketed oral drugs.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>27423371</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.drudis.2016.07.007</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2425-3091</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1359-6446
ispartof Drug discovery today, 2016-10, Vol.21 (10), p.1719-1727
issn 1359-6446
1878-5832
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1826724140
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Administration, Oral
Animals
Drug Discovery
Humans
Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions
Pharmaceutical Preparations - administration & dosage
Pharmaceutical Preparations - chemistry
Pharmaceutical Preparations - metabolism
Solubility
title Quality guidelines for oral drug candidates: dose, solubility and lipophilicity
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T06%3A54%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quality%20guidelines%20for%20oral%20drug%20candidates:%20dose,%20solubility%20and%20lipophilicity&rft.jtitle=Drug%20discovery%20today&rft.au=Bayliss,%20Martin%20K.&rft.date=2016-10&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1719&rft.epage=1727&rft.pages=1719-1727&rft.issn=1359-6446&rft.eissn=1878-5832&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.drudis.2016.07.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1826724140%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-f0b93e7115094722d711aa187a48815e4e8ec4f0f113a94eb184a276d97e00c73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1826724140&rft_id=info:pmid/27423371&rfr_iscdi=true