Loading…
Quality guidelines for oral drug candidates: dose, solubility and lipophilicity
[Display omitted] •Experimental properties of GSK's oral portfolio were compared with marketed drugs.•Properties were dose, solubility and the property forecast index (chromatographic Log D + aromatic ring count).•A model combining property cutoffs differentiated GSK's candidates from oral...
Saved in:
Published in: | Drug discovery today 2016-10, Vol.21 (10), p.1719-1727 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-f0b93e7115094722d711aa187a48815e4e8ec4f0f113a94eb184a276d97e00c73 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-f0b93e7115094722d711aa187a48815e4e8ec4f0f113a94eb184a276d97e00c73 |
container_end_page | 1727 |
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1719 |
container_title | Drug discovery today |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Bayliss, Martin K. Butler, James Feldman, Paul L. Green, Darren V.S. Leeson, Paul D. Palovich, Michael R. Taylor, Anthony J. |
description | [Display omitted]
•Experimental properties of GSK's oral portfolio were compared with marketed drugs.•Properties were dose, solubility and the property forecast index (chromatographic Log D + aromatic ring count).•A model combining property cutoffs differentiated GSK's candidates from oral drugs.•The model provides guidance for seeking and selecting oral clinical candidates.
In an attempt to seek increased understanding of compound attributes that influence successful drug pipeline progression, GlaxoSmithKline's portfolio of oral candidates was compared with reference sets of marketed oral drugs. The approach differs from other attrition studies by explicitly focusing on choosing ‘the right compound’ by applying relevant, experimentally derived properties. The analysis led to four proposed compound quality categories, created by combining specific criteria for three measures: dose, solubility and the property forecast index, a composite measure of lipophilicity using chromatographically determined LogD and aromaticity. The ‘three properties’ provide benchmarked guidelines for project teams to use when seeking and selecting clinical candidates, because they reflect the property distribution of marketed oral drugs. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.drudis.2016.07.007 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1826724140</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1359644616302574</els_id><sourcerecordid>1826724140</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-f0b93e7115094722d711aa187a48815e4e8ec4f0f113a94eb184a276d97e00c73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF9PwyAUxYnROJ1-A2N49MFWoLS0PpiYxX_JksVEnwmF28nSlQqtyb69zE0ffbr3cs_hwA-hC0pSSmhxs0qNH40NKYtTSkRKiDhAJ7QUZZKXGTuMfZZXScF5MUGnIawIoazKi2M0YYKzLBP0BC1eR9XaYYOXozXQ2g4CbpzHzqsWx4Al1qoz1qgBwi02LsA1Dq4da_vjijvc2t71H3HW8eQMHTWqDXC-r1P0_vjwNntO5ounl9n9PNFZwYakIXWVgaA0JxUXjJnYKhXfrnhZ0hw4lKB5QxpKM1VxqGnJFROFqQQQokU2RVe7e3vvPkcIg1zboKFtVQduDJKWrBCMU06ilO-k2rsQPDSy93at_EZSIrco5UruUMotSkmEjCij7XKfMNZrMH-mX3ZRcLcTQPznlwUvg7bQaTDWgx6kcfb_hG-YM4al</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1826724140</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quality guidelines for oral drug candidates: dose, solubility and lipophilicity</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Bayliss, Martin K. ; Butler, James ; Feldman, Paul L. ; Green, Darren V.S. ; Leeson, Paul D. ; Palovich, Michael R. ; Taylor, Anthony J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bayliss, Martin K. ; Butler, James ; Feldman, Paul L. ; Green, Darren V.S. ; Leeson, Paul D. ; Palovich, Michael R. ; Taylor, Anthony J.</creatorcontrib><description>[Display omitted]
•Experimental properties of GSK's oral portfolio were compared with marketed drugs.•Properties were dose, solubility and the property forecast index (chromatographic Log D + aromatic ring count).•A model combining property cutoffs differentiated GSK's candidates from oral drugs.•The model provides guidance for seeking and selecting oral clinical candidates.
In an attempt to seek increased understanding of compound attributes that influence successful drug pipeline progression, GlaxoSmithKline's portfolio of oral candidates was compared with reference sets of marketed oral drugs. The approach differs from other attrition studies by explicitly focusing on choosing ‘the right compound’ by applying relevant, experimentally derived properties. The analysis led to four proposed compound quality categories, created by combining specific criteria for three measures: dose, solubility and the property forecast index, a composite measure of lipophilicity using chromatographically determined LogD and aromaticity. The ‘three properties’ provide benchmarked guidelines for project teams to use when seeking and selecting clinical candidates, because they reflect the property distribution of marketed oral drugs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1359-6446</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-5832</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2016.07.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27423371</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Administration, Oral ; Animals ; Drug Discovery ; Humans ; Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions ; Pharmaceutical Preparations - administration & dosage ; Pharmaceutical Preparations - chemistry ; Pharmaceutical Preparations - metabolism ; Solubility</subject><ispartof>Drug discovery today, 2016-10, Vol.21 (10), p.1719-1727</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-f0b93e7115094722d711aa187a48815e4e8ec4f0f113a94eb184a276d97e00c73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-f0b93e7115094722d711aa187a48815e4e8ec4f0f113a94eb184a276d97e00c73</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2425-3091</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27423371$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bayliss, Martin K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butler, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feldman, Paul L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Darren V.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leeson, Paul D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palovich, Michael R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Anthony J.</creatorcontrib><title>Quality guidelines for oral drug candidates: dose, solubility and lipophilicity</title><title>Drug discovery today</title><addtitle>Drug Discov Today</addtitle><description>[Display omitted]
•Experimental properties of GSK's oral portfolio were compared with marketed drugs.•Properties were dose, solubility and the property forecast index (chromatographic Log D + aromatic ring count).•A model combining property cutoffs differentiated GSK's candidates from oral drugs.•The model provides guidance for seeking and selecting oral clinical candidates.
In an attempt to seek increased understanding of compound attributes that influence successful drug pipeline progression, GlaxoSmithKline's portfolio of oral candidates was compared with reference sets of marketed oral drugs. The approach differs from other attrition studies by explicitly focusing on choosing ‘the right compound’ by applying relevant, experimentally derived properties. The analysis led to four proposed compound quality categories, created by combining specific criteria for three measures: dose, solubility and the property forecast index, a composite measure of lipophilicity using chromatographically determined LogD and aromaticity. The ‘three properties’ provide benchmarked guidelines for project teams to use when seeking and selecting clinical candidates, because they reflect the property distribution of marketed oral drugs.</description><subject>Administration, Oral</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Drug Discovery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical Preparations - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical Preparations - chemistry</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical Preparations - metabolism</subject><subject>Solubility</subject><issn>1359-6446</issn><issn>1878-5832</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kF9PwyAUxYnROJ1-A2N49MFWoLS0PpiYxX_JksVEnwmF28nSlQqtyb69zE0ffbr3cs_hwA-hC0pSSmhxs0qNH40NKYtTSkRKiDhAJ7QUZZKXGTuMfZZXScF5MUGnIawIoazKi2M0YYKzLBP0BC1eR9XaYYOXozXQ2g4CbpzHzqsWx4Al1qoz1qgBwi02LsA1Dq4da_vjijvc2t71H3HW8eQMHTWqDXC-r1P0_vjwNntO5ounl9n9PNFZwYakIXWVgaA0JxUXjJnYKhXfrnhZ0hw4lKB5QxpKM1VxqGnJFROFqQQQokU2RVe7e3vvPkcIg1zboKFtVQduDJKWrBCMU06ilO-k2rsQPDSy93at_EZSIrco5UruUMotSkmEjCij7XKfMNZrMH-mX3ZRcLcTQPznlwUvg7bQaTDWgx6kcfb_hG-YM4al</recordid><startdate>201610</startdate><enddate>201610</enddate><creator>Bayliss, Martin K.</creator><creator>Butler, James</creator><creator>Feldman, Paul L.</creator><creator>Green, Darren V.S.</creator><creator>Leeson, Paul D.</creator><creator>Palovich, Michael R.</creator><creator>Taylor, Anthony J.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2425-3091</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201610</creationdate><title>Quality guidelines for oral drug candidates: dose, solubility and lipophilicity</title><author>Bayliss, Martin K. ; Butler, James ; Feldman, Paul L. ; Green, Darren V.S. ; Leeson, Paul D. ; Palovich, Michael R. ; Taylor, Anthony J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-f0b93e7115094722d711aa187a48815e4e8ec4f0f113a94eb184a276d97e00c73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Administration, Oral</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Drug Discovery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical Preparations - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical Preparations - chemistry</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical Preparations - metabolism</topic><topic>Solubility</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bayliss, Martin K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butler, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feldman, Paul L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Darren V.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leeson, Paul D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palovich, Michael R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Anthony J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Drug discovery today</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bayliss, Martin K.</au><au>Butler, James</au><au>Feldman, Paul L.</au><au>Green, Darren V.S.</au><au>Leeson, Paul D.</au><au>Palovich, Michael R.</au><au>Taylor, Anthony J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quality guidelines for oral drug candidates: dose, solubility and lipophilicity</atitle><jtitle>Drug discovery today</jtitle><addtitle>Drug Discov Today</addtitle><date>2016-10</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1719</spage><epage>1727</epage><pages>1719-1727</pages><issn>1359-6446</issn><eissn>1878-5832</eissn><abstract>[Display omitted]
•Experimental properties of GSK's oral portfolio were compared with marketed drugs.•Properties were dose, solubility and the property forecast index (chromatographic Log D + aromatic ring count).•A model combining property cutoffs differentiated GSK's candidates from oral drugs.•The model provides guidance for seeking and selecting oral clinical candidates.
In an attempt to seek increased understanding of compound attributes that influence successful drug pipeline progression, GlaxoSmithKline's portfolio of oral candidates was compared with reference sets of marketed oral drugs. The approach differs from other attrition studies by explicitly focusing on choosing ‘the right compound’ by applying relevant, experimentally derived properties. The analysis led to four proposed compound quality categories, created by combining specific criteria for three measures: dose, solubility and the property forecast index, a composite measure of lipophilicity using chromatographically determined LogD and aromaticity. The ‘three properties’ provide benchmarked guidelines for project teams to use when seeking and selecting clinical candidates, because they reflect the property distribution of marketed oral drugs.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>27423371</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.drudis.2016.07.007</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2425-3091</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1359-6446 |
ispartof | Drug discovery today, 2016-10, Vol.21 (10), p.1719-1727 |
issn | 1359-6446 1878-5832 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1826724140 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | Administration, Oral Animals Drug Discovery Humans Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions Pharmaceutical Preparations - administration & dosage Pharmaceutical Preparations - chemistry Pharmaceutical Preparations - metabolism Solubility |
title | Quality guidelines for oral drug candidates: dose, solubility and lipophilicity |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T06%3A54%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quality%20guidelines%20for%20oral%20drug%20candidates:%20dose,%20solubility%20and%20lipophilicity&rft.jtitle=Drug%20discovery%20today&rft.au=Bayliss,%20Martin%20K.&rft.date=2016-10&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1719&rft.epage=1727&rft.pages=1719-1727&rft.issn=1359-6446&rft.eissn=1878-5832&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.drudis.2016.07.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1826724140%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-f0b93e7115094722d711aa187a48815e4e8ec4f0f113a94eb184a276d97e00c73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1826724140&rft_id=info:pmid/27423371&rfr_iscdi=true |