Mini‐breast reconstruction with an omental flap: a retrospective clinical study

Introduction Potential challenges associated with immediate small breast reconstruction include an inadequate size of the donor site, a thinner skin envelope and limited selection of implants. We present immediate postmastectomy reconstruction of small breasts with a laparoscopically harvested pedic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:ANZ journal of surgery 2017-12, Vol.87 (12), p.E261-E265
Main Authors: Kim, Hoon, Yoon, Chi Sun, Lee, Hoon Bum, Ko, Byung Kyun, Kim, Gyu Yeol, Kim, Kyu Nam
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Body mass
Body mass index
Body size
Breast cancer
breast reconstruction
Breasts
Chemotherapy
Complications
Hernia
Implants
Intestine
laparoscopy
Mastectomy
Morbidity
omentum
Patients
Plastic surgery
Radiation
Radiation therapy
retrospective study
Skin
Transplants & implants
Tumors
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Introduction Potential challenges associated with immediate small breast reconstruction include an inadequate size of the donor site, a thinner skin envelope and limited selection of implants. We present immediate postmastectomy reconstruction of small breasts with a laparoscopically harvested pedicled omental flap (LHPOF) in five Korean women. Methods From December 2014 to July 2015, we performed immediate postmastectomy reconstruction with an LHPOF in five breast cancer patients. Data on the patients’ age; body mass index; tumour size; site, type and weight of the mastectomy specimen; operative time; hospital stay; complications; postoperative chemotherapy or radiation therapy; and follow‐up duration were reviewed in this retrospective clinical study. Results The mean mastectomy specimen weight was 212 g (range: 104–272 g). The mean operative time was 298 min (range: 240–380 min), and the mean harvesting time was 75 min (range: 65–90 min). There were no flap‐related complications such as fat necrosis or flap loss and no donor site‐related complications such as bowel dysfunction, an epigastric bulge or hernia during the follow‐up period (average: 8.2 months, range: 5–11 months). The cosmetic results were satisfactory. Discussion The LHPOF can be useful for immediate postmastectomy reconstruction of small breasts, because it provides a soft and naturally ptotic appearance of the reconstructed breast (versus implant‐based reconstruction) with low donor‐site morbidity (versus other autologous tissue reconstruction approaches).
ISSN:1445-1433
1445-2197
DOI:10.1111/ans.13701