Understanding scientific collaboration in the research life cycle: Bio- and nanoscientists' motivations, information-sharing and communication practices, and barriers to collaboration

This study aims to identify the way researchers collaborate with other researchers in the course of the scientific research life cycle and provide information to the designers of e‐Science and e‐Research implementations. On the basis of in‐depth interviews with and on‐site observations of 24 scienti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 2016-08, Vol.67 (8), p.1836-1848
Main Authors: Chung, EunKyung, Kwon, Nahyun, Lee, Jungyeoun
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Barriers
Cooperation
Culture
Formations
Information dissemination
Korea
Nanostructure
Scientists
Security
user models
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This study aims to identify the way researchers collaborate with other researchers in the course of the scientific research life cycle and provide information to the designers of e‐Science and e‐Research implementations. On the basis of in‐depth interviews with and on‐site observations of 24 scientists and a follow‐up focus group interview in the field of bioscience/nanoscience and technology in Korea, we examined scientific collaboration using the framework of the scientific research life cycle. We attempt to explain the major motivations, characteristics of communication and information sharing, and barriers associated with scientists' research collaboration practices throughout the research life cycle. The findings identify several notable phenomena including motivating factors, the timing of collaboration formation, partner selection, communication methods, information‐sharing practices, and barriers at each phase of the life cycle. We find that specific motivations were related to specific phases. The formation of collaboration was observed throughout the entire process, not only in the beginning phase of the cycle. For communication and information‐sharing practices, scientists continue to favor traditional means of communication for security reasons. Barriers to collaboration throughout the phases included different priorities, competitive tensions, and a hierarchical culture among collaborators, whereas credit sharing was a barrier in the research product phase.
ISSN:2330-1635
2330-1643
DOI:10.1002/asi.23520