Weatherization impacts and baseline indoor environmental quality in low income single-family homes

Understanding the impact of energy efficiency measures on Indoor Environmental Quality (IEQ) is important to building science and public health. Data were collected at three North Carolina locations for CO2, CO, NO2, temperature, RH, formaldehyde, radon, PM2.5, PM10, particle counts, household chara...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Building and environment 2016-10, Vol.107, p.181-190
Main Authors: Doll, S.C., Davison, E.L., Painting, B.R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Carbon dioxide
Carbon monoxide
Energy-efficiency
Formaldehyde
Heating
IEQ
Low-income housing
Nitrogen dioxide
Particle size distribution
Pets
Radon
Seasons
Weatherization
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Understanding the impact of energy efficiency measures on Indoor Environmental Quality (IEQ) is important to building science and public health. Data were collected at three North Carolina locations for CO2, CO, NO2, temperature, RH, formaldehyde, radon, PM2.5, PM10, particle counts, household characteristics, and weather in 69 homes, before (PRE) and after (POST) weatherization, and in 13 control homes. Comparison of IEQ data to indoor and ambient air guidelines showed the number of homes with acceptable IEQ was the same or greater after weatherization for all parameters except temperature, and PM in smoking homes. POST compliance was over 90% for CO2, CO, Radon, and NO2 in all homes, and RH and PM in non-smoking homes. Overall POST compliance for formaldehyde was 75%, and in smoking homes 6%, 24%, and 78% for PM2.5, PM10, and RH, respectively. Wilcoxon test results, at significance level 1.0μm and PM10 in heating season homes with pets, and 10µm particles in cooling season homes. Chi-Square analysis identified relationships between season and CO, NO2, and formaldehyde. Positive correlations were identified for pets and particles >1.0μm, smokers and 0.3μm and 0.5µm particles, heating season and increasing formaldehyde, and negative correlation for CO2 and ventilation. •Data collected in 69 pre- and post-weatherization homes for CO2, CO, NO2, formaldehyde, radon, temperature,RH and particles.•Same or more homes meet IEQ guidelines after weatherization, except temperature and particles.•Fewer smoking homes meet IEQ guidelines for PM2.5 and PM10 after weatherization with
ISSN:0360-1323
1873-684X
DOI:10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.06.021