Electrostatic spraying in the chemical control of Triozoida limbata (Enderlein) (Hemiptera: Triozidae) in guava trees (Psidium guajava L.)

• Published in: Pest management science 2017-06, Vol.73 (6), p.1148-1153
• Main Authors: Tavares, Rafael M, Cunha, João PAR, Alves, Thales C, Bueno, Mariana R, Silva, Sérgio M, Zandonadi, César HS
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animals; application technology; Chemical control; Chemical pest control; Deposition; electrification of droplets; Electrostatic properties; electrostatic sprayer; Guava; Hemiptera; Insect Control - instrumentation; Insecticides; Motor task performance; Neonicotinoids; Nitro Compounds; Performance evaluation; Pest control; Pesticide application; Pesticide Residues; Pesticides; Plant Leaves; Psidium; Psidium guajava; Soil mixtures; Soils; Spraying; Trees
• ISSN: 1526-498X; 1526-4998
• DOI: 10.1002/ps.4433

BACKGROUND Owing to the difficulty in reaching targets during pesticide applications on guava trees, it is important to evaluate new technologies that may improve pest management. In electrostatic spraying, an electric force is added to the droplets to control their movements such that they are efficiently directed to the target. The present study evaluated the performance of electrostatic and non‐electrostatic spraying in the control of the guava psyllid, the deposition of the spray mixture on the leaves and the losses to the soil. RESULTS The deposition of the spray mixture was up to 2 times greater when using electrostatic spraying in comparison with non‐electrostatic application. The losses of the spray mixture to the soil were up to 4 times smaller with the electrostatic spraying. Electrostatic spraying had better control of the psyllid. CONCLUSION It was possible to reduce the volume rate of application with electrostatic spraying without adversely affecting the control of the guava psyllid. © 2016 Society of Chemical Industry