NHWAVE: Consistent boundary conditions and turbulence modeling

• Published in: Ocean modelling (Oxford) 2016-10, Vol.106, p.121-130
• Main Authors: Derakhti, Morteza, Kirby, James T., Shi, Fengyan, Ma, Gangfeng
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Boundary conditions; Breaking; Dynamic boundary conditions; Marine; Mathematical models; Non-hydrostatic model; Ocean models; Slopes; Stresses; Turbulence; Turbulent flow; Wave breaking
• ISSN: 1463-5003; 1463-5011
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ocemod.2016.09.002

•We obtain a new set of equations for the RANS equations in a σ-coordinate system.•Consistent surface and bottom boundary conditions are derived.•New boundary conditions do not generate unphysical vorticity at the free surface.•New boundary conditions significantly improved TKE prediction. Large-scale σ-coordinate ocean circulation models neglect the horizontal variation of σ in the calculation of stress terms and boundary conditions. Following this practice, the effects of surface and bottom slopes in the dynamic surface and bottom boundary conditions have been usually neglected in the available non-hydrostatic wave-resolving models using a terrain-following grid. In this paper, we derive consistent surface and bottom boundary conditions for the normal and tangential stress fields as well as a Neumann-type boundary condition for scalar fluxes. Further, we examine the role of surface slopes in the predicted near-surface velocity and turbulence fields in surface gravity waves. By comparing the predicted velocity field in a deep-water standing wave in a closed basin, we show that the consistent boundary conditions do not generate unphysical vorticity at the free surface, in contrast to commonly used, simplified stress boundary conditions developed by ignoring all contributions except vertical shear in the transformation of stress terms. In addition, it is shown that the consistent boundary conditions significantly improve predicted wave shape, velocity and turbulence fields in regular surf zone breaking waves, compared with the simplified case. A more extensive model-data comparison of various breaking wave properties in different types of surface breaking waves is presented in companion papers (Derakhti et al., 2016a,b).