Mind the gap! Lessons from science-based stakeholder dialogue in climate-adapted management of wetlands

• Published in: Journal of environmental management 2017-01, Vol.186 (Pt 1), p.108-119
• Main Authors: Grygoruk, Mateusz, Rannow, Sven
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adaptive management; Biebrza; Climate; Climate Change; Conservation of Natural Resources - methods; Ecology - organization & administration; Ecosystem; Environment; Humans; Parks, Recreational; Poland; Stakeholder dialogue; Wetlands
• ISSN: 0301-4797; 1095-8630
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.10.066

Effective stakeholder involvement is crucial for the management of protected areas, especially when new challenges like adaptation to climate change need to be addressed. Under these circumstances, science-based stakeholder involvement is required. However, there is often a gap between the information produced by science and the need for information from stakeholders. Along with the design and implementation of adaptive management strategies and policies, efforts must be taken to adjust messages about conservation and adaptation issues, to make them easier to understand, relevant and acceptable for stakeholders. In this paper, the experience of closing the gap between scientific information and the user needs of stakeholders in the Biebrza Valley is documented. The requirements of efficient stakeholder dialogue and the raising of awareness are then indicated. We conclude that many attempts to raise awareness of environmental conservation require improvements. Messages often need to be adjusted for different stakeholders and their various perception levels to efficiently anticipate the potential impacts of the changing climate on ecosystem management. We also revealed that the autonomous adaptation measures implemented by stakeholders to mitigate impacts of climatic change often contradict adaptive management planned and implemented by environmental authorities. We conclude that there is a demand for boundary spanners that can build a bridge between complex scientific outputs and stakeholder needs. •Lack of attribution of environmental changes to climate change by local stakeholders.•Outputs of climate-related scientific projects fail to match perception of stakeholders.•Stakeholder segmentation helps to improve the facilitation of the adaptation process.•Autonomous adaptation measures taken by stakeholders induce ecosystem deterioration.•Autonomous adaptation measures taken by stakeholders contradict adaptive management.