Loading…
Risk Stratification According to the Total Number of Factors That Meet the Indication Criteria for Radical Lymph Node Dissection in Patients with Early Gastric Cancer at Risk for Lymph Node Metastasis
Background Extended indications for endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer (EGC) have been widely accepted. However, according to current guidelines, additional gastrectomy with lymph node dissection (LND) is recommended for patients proven to have potential risks of lymph node metastasis (LN...
Saved in:
Published in: | Annals of surgical oncology 2016-12, Vol.23 (Suppl 5), p.792-797 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background
Extended indications for endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer (EGC) have been widely accepted. However, according to current guidelines, additional gastrectomy with lymph node dissection (LND) is recommended for patients proven to have potential risks of lymph node metastasis (LNM) on histopathological findings. The aim of this study was to elucidate the risk stratification of outcome and LNM according to the number of factors that meet the inclusion criteria for radical LND for possible LNM (LNM risk factors) in patients with negative endoscopic resection margin.
Methods
We enrolled 511 EGC patients whose tumors did not meet the absolute or extended indications for endoscopic resection, and investigated the risk stratification of prognosis and LNM according to the total number of LNM risk factors.
Results
Recurrence-free and overall survival rates were significantly higher in patients with fewer LNM risk factors for surgical indication (
p
= 0.0274 and 0.0002, respectively; log-rank test), and the total number of LNM risk factors and frequency of LNM were significantly correlated (
p
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 1068-9265 1534-4681 |
DOI: | 10.1245/s10434-016-5553-0 |