Loading…
Vitamin D concentrations in fortified foods and dietary supplements intended for infants: Implications for vitamin D intake
•Foods with added vitamin D contained 50–153% of the labelled vitamin D content.•Dietary supplements contained 8–177% of the labelled vitamin D content.•Vitamin D content of 3 of 44 products deviated significantly from EU tolerances.•Trusting label information only may result in invalid estimates of...
Saved in:
Published in: | Food chemistry 2017-04, Vol.221, p.629-635 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | •Foods with added vitamin D contained 50–153% of the labelled vitamin D content.•Dietary supplements contained 8–177% of the labelled vitamin D content.•Vitamin D content of 3 of 44 products deviated significantly from EU tolerances.•Trusting label information only may result in invalid estimates of intake.
Due to potential overages to cover losses during shelf life, the actual vitamin D concentration of fortified foods and dietary supplements may deviate from the label. In this pilot study the vitamin D concentrations of fortified foods (n=29; follow-on formula, baby porridge, curd cheese dessert) and dietary supplements (n=15), both specifically intended for infants, were analytically determined. Compared to the declared values, the vitamin D content ranged from 50% to 153% for fortified foods and from 8% to 177% for supplements. In general, both instant follow-on formula and oil-based supplements had a measured vitamin D content similar to or higher than the labelled value. Ready-to-eat baby porridge was the only category in which all measured vitamin D concentrations were below the declared value (74–81%). The use of label information for fortified foods and dietary supplements may result in invalid estimations of vitamin D intake distributions of infants; both under- and overestimation may occur. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0308-8146 1873-7072 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.11.128 |