Loading…
The early processing of metaphors and similes: Evidence from eye movements
This eye movement study examined how people read nominal metaphors and similes in order to investigate how the surface form, or wording, of these expressions affected early processing. Participants silently read metaphors (knowledge is a river) and similes (knowledge is like a river). The identical...
Saved in:
Published in: | Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) 2018-01, Vol.71 (1), p.161-168 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-653ed1dc95a2151082e451f1619e15802327d94c2ba8b2fae50c66adf90a9ff63 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-653ed1dc95a2151082e451f1619e15802327d94c2ba8b2fae50c66adf90a9ff63 |
container_end_page | 168 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 161 |
container_title | Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) |
container_volume | 71 |
creator | Ashby, Jane Roncero, Carlos de Almeida, Roberto G Agauas, Stephen J |
description | This eye movement study examined how people read nominal metaphors and similes in order to investigate how the surface form, or wording, of these expressions affected early processing. Participants silently read metaphors (knowledge is a river) and similes (knowledge is like a river). The identical words were used in the topic–vehicle pair (knowledge–river) in both conditions. Experiments 1 and 2 demonstrated longer reading times and a higher proportion of regressions in metaphors than in similes. Familiarity modulated later metaphor effects in Experiment 1, but not in Experiment 2. Reading ability did not modulate the metaphor effects in Experiment 2. Results indicate that readers revised their initial interpretation of metaphors before moving on to read new text. This suggests that readers did not initially hold figurative interpretations of apt nominal metaphors that are somewhat familiar. Metaphor interpretation may be fast, but it is not easy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/17470218.2016.1278456 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1856594023</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1080_17470218.2016.1278456</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1856594023</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-653ed1dc95a2151082e451f1619e15802327d94c2ba8b2fae50c66adf90a9ff63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMotlZ_ghLw4mVrks3Hrjcp9YuCl3oO6e6k3bK7qUm30H9vSj8ED54yhGfemXkQuqVkSElGHqniijCaDRmhckiZyriQZ6i_-08IY_L8VNOsh65CWBLCUyXVJeqxjAgpueqjj-kCMBhfb_HKuwJCqNo5dhY3sDarhfMBm7bEoWqqGsITHm-qEtoCsPWuwbAF3LgNNNCuwzW6sKYOcHN4B-jrZTwdvSWTz9f30fMkKThT60SKFEpaFrkwjIp4CwMuqKWS5kBFRljKVJnzgs1MNmPWgCCFlKa0OTG5tTIdoId9blz4u4Ow1k0VCqhr04LrgqaZkCLnMSii93_Qpet8G7fTLBrgVKUij5TYU4V3IXiweuWrxvitpkTvZOujbL2TrQ-yY9_dIb2bNVCeuo52I8D2QDBz-B39f-oPYEeG2g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2056417359</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The early processing of metaphors and similes: Evidence from eye movements</title><source>SAGE</source><creator>Ashby, Jane ; Roncero, Carlos ; de Almeida, Roberto G ; Agauas, Stephen J</creator><creatorcontrib>Ashby, Jane ; Roncero, Carlos ; de Almeida, Roberto G ; Agauas, Stephen J</creatorcontrib><description>This eye movement study examined how people read nominal metaphors and similes in order to investigate how the surface form, or wording, of these expressions affected early processing. Participants silently read metaphors (knowledge is a river) and similes (knowledge is like a river). The identical words were used in the topic–vehicle pair (knowledge–river) in both conditions. Experiments 1 and 2 demonstrated longer reading times and a higher proportion of regressions in metaphors than in similes. Familiarity modulated later metaphor effects in Experiment 1, but not in Experiment 2. Reading ability did not modulate the metaphor effects in Experiment 2. Results indicate that readers revised their initial interpretation of metaphors before moving on to read new text. This suggests that readers did not initially hold figurative interpretations of apt nominal metaphors that are somewhat familiar. Metaphor interpretation may be fast, but it is not easy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1747-0218</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1747-0226</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1278456</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28056647</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Experiments ; Eye movements ; Metaphor</subject><ispartof>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006), 2018-01, Vol.71 (1), p.161-168</ispartof><rights>Experimental Psychology Society 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-653ed1dc95a2151082e451f1619e15802327d94c2ba8b2fae50c66adf90a9ff63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-653ed1dc95a2151082e451f1619e15802327d94c2ba8b2fae50c66adf90a9ff63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,79111</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28056647$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ashby, Jane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roncero, Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Almeida, Roberto G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agauas, Stephen J</creatorcontrib><title>The early processing of metaphors and similes: Evidence from eye movements</title><title>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)</title><addtitle>Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)</addtitle><description>This eye movement study examined how people read nominal metaphors and similes in order to investigate how the surface form, or wording, of these expressions affected early processing. Participants silently read metaphors (knowledge is a river) and similes (knowledge is like a river). The identical words were used in the topic–vehicle pair (knowledge–river) in both conditions. Experiments 1 and 2 demonstrated longer reading times and a higher proportion of regressions in metaphors than in similes. Familiarity modulated later metaphor effects in Experiment 1, but not in Experiment 2. Reading ability did not modulate the metaphor effects in Experiment 2. Results indicate that readers revised their initial interpretation of metaphors before moving on to read new text. This suggests that readers did not initially hold figurative interpretations of apt nominal metaphors that are somewhat familiar. Metaphor interpretation may be fast, but it is not easy.</description><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Eye movements</subject><subject>Metaphor</subject><issn>1747-0218</issn><issn>1747-0226</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMotlZ_ghLw4mVrks3Hrjcp9YuCl3oO6e6k3bK7qUm30H9vSj8ED54yhGfemXkQuqVkSElGHqniijCaDRmhckiZyriQZ6i_-08IY_L8VNOsh65CWBLCUyXVJeqxjAgpueqjj-kCMBhfb_HKuwJCqNo5dhY3sDarhfMBm7bEoWqqGsITHm-qEtoCsPWuwbAF3LgNNNCuwzW6sKYOcHN4B-jrZTwdvSWTz9f30fMkKThT60SKFEpaFrkwjIp4CwMuqKWS5kBFRljKVJnzgs1MNmPWgCCFlKa0OTG5tTIdoId9blz4u4Ow1k0VCqhr04LrgqaZkCLnMSii93_Qpet8G7fTLBrgVKUij5TYU4V3IXiweuWrxvitpkTvZOujbL2TrQ-yY9_dIb2bNVCeuo52I8D2QDBz-B39f-oPYEeG2g</recordid><startdate>20180101</startdate><enddate>20180101</enddate><creator>Ashby, Jane</creator><creator>Roncero, Carlos</creator><creator>de Almeida, Roberto G</creator><creator>Agauas, Stephen J</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180101</creationdate><title>The early processing of metaphors and similes: Evidence from eye movements</title><author>Ashby, Jane ; Roncero, Carlos ; de Almeida, Roberto G ; Agauas, Stephen J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-653ed1dc95a2151082e451f1619e15802327d94c2ba8b2fae50c66adf90a9ff63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Eye movements</topic><topic>Metaphor</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ashby, Jane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roncero, Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Almeida, Roberto G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agauas, Stephen J</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ashby, Jane</au><au>Roncero, Carlos</au><au>de Almeida, Roberto G</au><au>Agauas, Stephen J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The early processing of metaphors and similes: Evidence from eye movements</atitle><jtitle>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)</jtitle><addtitle>Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)</addtitle><date>2018-01-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>161</spage><epage>168</epage><pages>161-168</pages><issn>1747-0218</issn><eissn>1747-0226</eissn><abstract>This eye movement study examined how people read nominal metaphors and similes in order to investigate how the surface form, or wording, of these expressions affected early processing. Participants silently read metaphors (knowledge is a river) and similes (knowledge is like a river). The identical words were used in the topic–vehicle pair (knowledge–river) in both conditions. Experiments 1 and 2 demonstrated longer reading times and a higher proportion of regressions in metaphors than in similes. Familiarity modulated later metaphor effects in Experiment 1, but not in Experiment 2. Reading ability did not modulate the metaphor effects in Experiment 2. Results indicate that readers revised their initial interpretation of metaphors before moving on to read new text. This suggests that readers did not initially hold figurative interpretations of apt nominal metaphors that are somewhat familiar. Metaphor interpretation may be fast, but it is not easy.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>28056647</pmid><doi>10.1080/17470218.2016.1278456</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1747-0218 |
ispartof | Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006), 2018-01, Vol.71 (1), p.161-168 |
issn | 1747-0218 1747-0226 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1856594023 |
source | SAGE |
subjects | Experiments Eye movements Metaphor |
title | The early processing of metaphors and similes: Evidence from eye movements |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T12%3A37%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20early%20processing%20of%20metaphors%20and%20similes:%20Evidence%20from%20eye%20movements&rft.jtitle=Quarterly%20journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology%20(2006)&rft.au=Ashby,%20Jane&rft.date=2018-01-01&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=161&rft.epage=168&rft.pages=161-168&rft.issn=1747-0218&rft.eissn=1747-0226&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/17470218.2016.1278456&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1856594023%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-653ed1dc95a2151082e451f1619e15802327d94c2ba8b2fae50c66adf90a9ff63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2056417359&rft_id=info:pmid/28056647&rft_sage_id=10.1080_17470218.2016.1278456&rfr_iscdi=true |