Loading…

The early processing of metaphors and similes: Evidence from eye movements

This eye movement study examined how people read nominal metaphors and similes in order to investigate how the surface form, or wording, of these expressions affected early processing. Participants silently read metaphors (knowledge is a river) and similes (knowledge is like a river). The identical...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) 2018-01, Vol.71 (1), p.161-168
Main Authors: Ashby, Jane, Roncero, Carlos, de Almeida, Roberto G, Agauas, Stephen J
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-653ed1dc95a2151082e451f1619e15802327d94c2ba8b2fae50c66adf90a9ff63
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-653ed1dc95a2151082e451f1619e15802327d94c2ba8b2fae50c66adf90a9ff63
container_end_page 168
container_issue 1
container_start_page 161
container_title Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)
container_volume 71
creator Ashby, Jane
Roncero, Carlos
de Almeida, Roberto G
Agauas, Stephen J
description This eye movement study examined how people read nominal metaphors and similes in order to investigate how the surface form, or wording, of these expressions affected early processing. Participants silently read metaphors (knowledge is a river) and similes (knowledge is like a river). The identical words were used in the topic–vehicle pair (knowledge–river) in both conditions. Experiments 1 and 2 demonstrated longer reading times and a higher proportion of regressions in metaphors than in similes. Familiarity modulated later metaphor effects in Experiment 1, but not in Experiment 2. Reading ability did not modulate the metaphor effects in Experiment 2. Results indicate that readers revised their initial interpretation of metaphors before moving on to read new text. This suggests that readers did not initially hold figurative interpretations of apt nominal metaphors that are somewhat familiar. Metaphor interpretation may be fast, but it is not easy.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/17470218.2016.1278456
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1856594023</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1080_17470218.2016.1278456</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1856594023</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-653ed1dc95a2151082e451f1619e15802327d94c2ba8b2fae50c66adf90a9ff63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMotlZ_ghLw4mVrks3Hrjcp9YuCl3oO6e6k3bK7qUm30H9vSj8ED54yhGfemXkQuqVkSElGHqniijCaDRmhckiZyriQZ6i_-08IY_L8VNOsh65CWBLCUyXVJeqxjAgpueqjj-kCMBhfb_HKuwJCqNo5dhY3sDarhfMBm7bEoWqqGsITHm-qEtoCsPWuwbAF3LgNNNCuwzW6sKYOcHN4B-jrZTwdvSWTz9f30fMkKThT60SKFEpaFrkwjIp4CwMuqKWS5kBFRljKVJnzgs1MNmPWgCCFlKa0OTG5tTIdoId9blz4u4Ow1k0VCqhr04LrgqaZkCLnMSii93_Qpet8G7fTLBrgVKUij5TYU4V3IXiweuWrxvitpkTvZOujbL2TrQ-yY9_dIb2bNVCeuo52I8D2QDBz-B39f-oPYEeG2g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2056417359</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The early processing of metaphors and similes: Evidence from eye movements</title><source>SAGE</source><creator>Ashby, Jane ; Roncero, Carlos ; de Almeida, Roberto G ; Agauas, Stephen J</creator><creatorcontrib>Ashby, Jane ; Roncero, Carlos ; de Almeida, Roberto G ; Agauas, Stephen J</creatorcontrib><description>This eye movement study examined how people read nominal metaphors and similes in order to investigate how the surface form, or wording, of these expressions affected early processing. Participants silently read metaphors (knowledge is a river) and similes (knowledge is like a river). The identical words were used in the topic–vehicle pair (knowledge–river) in both conditions. Experiments 1 and 2 demonstrated longer reading times and a higher proportion of regressions in metaphors than in similes. Familiarity modulated later metaphor effects in Experiment 1, but not in Experiment 2. Reading ability did not modulate the metaphor effects in Experiment 2. Results indicate that readers revised their initial interpretation of metaphors before moving on to read new text. This suggests that readers did not initially hold figurative interpretations of apt nominal metaphors that are somewhat familiar. Metaphor interpretation may be fast, but it is not easy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1747-0218</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1747-0226</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1278456</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28056647</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Experiments ; Eye movements ; Metaphor</subject><ispartof>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006), 2018-01, Vol.71 (1), p.161-168</ispartof><rights>Experimental Psychology Society 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-653ed1dc95a2151082e451f1619e15802327d94c2ba8b2fae50c66adf90a9ff63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-653ed1dc95a2151082e451f1619e15802327d94c2ba8b2fae50c66adf90a9ff63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,79111</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28056647$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ashby, Jane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roncero, Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Almeida, Roberto G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agauas, Stephen J</creatorcontrib><title>The early processing of metaphors and similes: Evidence from eye movements</title><title>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)</title><addtitle>Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)</addtitle><description>This eye movement study examined how people read nominal metaphors and similes in order to investigate how the surface form, or wording, of these expressions affected early processing. Participants silently read metaphors (knowledge is a river) and similes (knowledge is like a river). The identical words were used in the topic–vehicle pair (knowledge–river) in both conditions. Experiments 1 and 2 demonstrated longer reading times and a higher proportion of regressions in metaphors than in similes. Familiarity modulated later metaphor effects in Experiment 1, but not in Experiment 2. Reading ability did not modulate the metaphor effects in Experiment 2. Results indicate that readers revised their initial interpretation of metaphors before moving on to read new text. This suggests that readers did not initially hold figurative interpretations of apt nominal metaphors that are somewhat familiar. Metaphor interpretation may be fast, but it is not easy.</description><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Eye movements</subject><subject>Metaphor</subject><issn>1747-0218</issn><issn>1747-0226</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMotlZ_ghLw4mVrks3Hrjcp9YuCl3oO6e6k3bK7qUm30H9vSj8ED54yhGfemXkQuqVkSElGHqniijCaDRmhckiZyriQZ6i_-08IY_L8VNOsh65CWBLCUyXVJeqxjAgpueqjj-kCMBhfb_HKuwJCqNo5dhY3sDarhfMBm7bEoWqqGsITHm-qEtoCsPWuwbAF3LgNNNCuwzW6sKYOcHN4B-jrZTwdvSWTz9f30fMkKThT60SKFEpaFrkwjIp4CwMuqKWS5kBFRljKVJnzgs1MNmPWgCCFlKa0OTG5tTIdoId9blz4u4Ow1k0VCqhr04LrgqaZkCLnMSii93_Qpet8G7fTLBrgVKUij5TYU4V3IXiweuWrxvitpkTvZOujbL2TrQ-yY9_dIb2bNVCeuo52I8D2QDBz-B39f-oPYEeG2g</recordid><startdate>20180101</startdate><enddate>20180101</enddate><creator>Ashby, Jane</creator><creator>Roncero, Carlos</creator><creator>de Almeida, Roberto G</creator><creator>Agauas, Stephen J</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180101</creationdate><title>The early processing of metaphors and similes: Evidence from eye movements</title><author>Ashby, Jane ; Roncero, Carlos ; de Almeida, Roberto G ; Agauas, Stephen J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-653ed1dc95a2151082e451f1619e15802327d94c2ba8b2fae50c66adf90a9ff63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Eye movements</topic><topic>Metaphor</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ashby, Jane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roncero, Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Almeida, Roberto G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agauas, Stephen J</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ashby, Jane</au><au>Roncero, Carlos</au><au>de Almeida, Roberto G</au><au>Agauas, Stephen J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The early processing of metaphors and similes: Evidence from eye movements</atitle><jtitle>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)</jtitle><addtitle>Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)</addtitle><date>2018-01-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>161</spage><epage>168</epage><pages>161-168</pages><issn>1747-0218</issn><eissn>1747-0226</eissn><abstract>This eye movement study examined how people read nominal metaphors and similes in order to investigate how the surface form, or wording, of these expressions affected early processing. Participants silently read metaphors (knowledge is a river) and similes (knowledge is like a river). The identical words were used in the topic–vehicle pair (knowledge–river) in both conditions. Experiments 1 and 2 demonstrated longer reading times and a higher proportion of regressions in metaphors than in similes. Familiarity modulated later metaphor effects in Experiment 1, but not in Experiment 2. Reading ability did not modulate the metaphor effects in Experiment 2. Results indicate that readers revised their initial interpretation of metaphors before moving on to read new text. This suggests that readers did not initially hold figurative interpretations of apt nominal metaphors that are somewhat familiar. Metaphor interpretation may be fast, but it is not easy.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>28056647</pmid><doi>10.1080/17470218.2016.1278456</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1747-0218
ispartof Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006), 2018-01, Vol.71 (1), p.161-168
issn 1747-0218
1747-0226
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1856594023
source SAGE
subjects Experiments
Eye movements
Metaphor
title The early processing of metaphors and similes: Evidence from eye movements
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T12%3A37%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20early%20processing%20of%20metaphors%20and%20similes:%20Evidence%20from%20eye%20movements&rft.jtitle=Quarterly%20journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology%20(2006)&rft.au=Ashby,%20Jane&rft.date=2018-01-01&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=161&rft.epage=168&rft.pages=161-168&rft.issn=1747-0218&rft.eissn=1747-0226&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/17470218.2016.1278456&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1856594023%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-653ed1dc95a2151082e451f1619e15802327d94c2ba8b2fae50c66adf90a9ff63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2056417359&rft_id=info:pmid/28056647&rft_sage_id=10.1080_17470218.2016.1278456&rfr_iscdi=true