Loading…

Dual vs Single Protease Inhibitor Therapy Following Antiretroviral Treatment Failure: A Randomized Trial

CONTEXT Management of antiretroviral treatment failure in patients receiving protease inhibitor (PI)–containing regimens is a therapeutic challenge. OBJECTIVE To assess whether adding a second PI improves antiviral efficacy of a 4-drug combination in patients with virologic failure while taking a PI...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association 2002-07, Vol.288 (2), p.169-180
Main Authors: Hammer, Scott M, Vaida, Florin, Bennett, Kara K, Holohan, Mary K, Sheiner, Lewis, Eron, Joseph J, Wheat, Lawrence Joseph, Mitsuyasu, Ronald T, Gulick, Roy M, Valentine, Fred T, Aberg, Judith A, Rogers, Michael D, Karol, Cheryl N, Saah, Alfred J, Lewis, Ronald H, Bessen, Laura J, Brosgart, Carol, DeGruttola, Victor, Mellors, John W, for the AIDS Clinical Trials Group 398 Study Team
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:CONTEXT Management of antiretroviral treatment failure in patients receiving protease inhibitor (PI)–containing regimens is a therapeutic challenge. OBJECTIVE To assess whether adding a second PI improves antiviral efficacy of a 4-drug combination in patients with virologic failure while taking a PI-containing regimen. DESIGN Multicenter, randomized, 4-arm trial, double-blind and placebo-controlled for second PI, conducted between October 1998 and April 2000, for which there was a 24-week primary analysis with extension to 48 weeks. SETTING Thirty-one participating AIDS (acquired immunodeficiency syndrome) Clinical Trials Units in the United States. PARTICIPANTS A total of 481 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)–infected persons with prior exposure to a maximum of 3 PIs and viral load above 1000 copies/mL. INTERVENTION Selectively randomized assignment (per prior PI exposure) to saquinavir (n = 116); indinavir (n = 69); nelfinavir (n = 139); or placebo twice per day (n = 157); in combination with amprenavir, abacavir, efavirenz, and adefovir dipivoxil. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Primary efficacy analysis involved the proportion with viral load below 200 copies/mL at 24 weeks. Other measures were changes in viral load and CD4 cell count from baseline, adverse events, and HIV drug susceptibility. RESULTS Of 481 patients, 148 (31%) had a viral load below 200 copies/mL at week 24. The proportions of patients with a viral load below 200 copies/mL in the saquinavir, indinavir, nelfinavir, and placebo arms were 34% (40/116), 36% (25/69), 34% (47/139), and 23% (36/157), respectively. The proportion in the combined dual-PI arms was higher than in the amprenavir-plus-placebo arm (35% [112/324] vs 23% [36/157], respectively; P = .002). Overall, a higher proportion of nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)–naive patients had a viral load below 200 copies/mL compared with NNRTI-experienced patients (43% [115/270] vs 16% [33/211], respectively; P
ISSN:0098-7484
1538-3598
DOI:10.1001/jama.288.2.169