Playing Follow the Leader: Status-Determining Traits in Relation to Collective Efficacy across Cultures

Increasing pressure on managing international teams has created a need for further understanding culturally relevant group processes. In this study, the cultural context of power distance is examined in relation to the status characteristics possessed by group members and their influence on group ef...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Organizational behavior and human decision processes 1999-12, Vol.80 (3), p.192-212
Main Author: Earley, P.Christopher
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Biological and medical sciences
Corporate culture
Decision making
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Hypotheses
Leadership
Organizational behavior
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Social interactions. Communication. Group processes
Social psychology
Statistical analysis
Studies
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Increasing pressure on managing international teams has created a need for further understanding culturally relevant group processes. In this study, the cultural context of power distance is examined in relation to the status characteristics possessed by group members and their influence on group efficacy estimations and performance. Data obtained from 288 senior managers coming from England, France, Thailand, and the United States were used to test the hypothesis that power distance would moderate the influence of member status on collective decisions made by a group. Results demonstrate that in high power distance cultures, collective judgments of group capability are more strongly tied to higher rather than to lower status group members' personal judgments. In low power distance cultures, members appear to contribute comparably to collective efficacy judgments. The implications of the study are discussed in terms of status differentials and group decision making across cultures.
ISSN:0749-5978
1095-9920
DOI:10.1006/obhd.1999.2863