Loading…
Vaginal paravaginal repair in the surgical treatment of anterior vaginal wall prolapse
Objective: To describe our technique and report our clinical experience with the vaginal paravaginal repair in the surgical treatment of displacement cystocele. Methods: Forty-five patients with bilateral paravaginal support defects underwent vaginal paravaginal repair during a 2-year period at our...
Saved in:
Published in: | Primary care update for Ob/Gyns 1998-07, Vol.5 (4), p.199-200 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Objective: To describe our technique and report our clinical experience with the vaginal paravaginal repair in the surgical treatment of displacement cystocele.
Methods: Forty-five patients with bilateral paravaginal support defects underwent vaginal paravaginal repair during a 2-year period at our institution. The technique of vaginal paravaginal repair will be illustrated through the use of anatomic photographs taken at the time of surgery. Demographic data were collected for each patient. Preoperative evaluation, intraoperative parameters, and postoperative course were reviewed.
Results: The technique of vaginal paravaginal repair was standardized with transvaginal entrance into the retropubic space bilaterally. The paravaginal defects were identified and repaired using permanent suture in a 3-point closure incorporating the pubocervical fascia, arcus tendineous, and vaginal wall. Concurrent repairs were performed as appropriate.
Mean age of the patients was 65.9 ± 2 years (range 35–76). Thirty-eight patients had advanced prolapse of the anterior vaginal wall beyond the introitus, and 21 patients had coexisting stress incontinence. Postoperatively, the length of stay was 2.6 ± 1.1 days (range 1–6) and urethral catheterization was required for a median 7 days. Intraoperative complications included 1 case of bilateral ureteral obstruction, and postoperative morbidity included 1 retropubic hematoma requiring re-exploration, 2 vaginal abscesses, and 2 postoperative transfusions.
Conclusion: The vaginal paravaginal repair is a safe and effective technique in the surgical correction of vaginal wall prolapse due to a displacement cystocele. The vaginal approach provides adequate exposure to the relevant anatomy and good clinical results. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1068-607X 1878-4283 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S1068-607X(98)00135-8 |