Loading…
Structure and Bonding of Diiodine Adducts of the Sulfur-Rich Donors 1,3-Dithiacyclohexane-2-thione (ptc) and 4,5-Ethylenedithio-1,3-dithiole-2-thione (ttb)
The reactions of I2 with ptc and ttb (title ligands) have been investigated in CHCl3 solution at different temperatures by spectrophotometry. A least-squares method procedure provided evidence for the formation of the 1:1 adducts. Crystals of the latter have been analyzed by X-ray diffraction method...
Saved in:
Published in: | Inorganic chemistry 1999-10, Vol.38 (21), p.4626-4636 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The reactions of I2 with ptc and ttb (title ligands) have been investigated in CHCl3 solution at different temperatures by spectrophotometry. A least-squares method procedure provided evidence for the formation of the 1:1 adducts. Crystals of the latter have been analyzed by X-ray diffraction methods (both monoclinic, P21/c; ptc·I2, a = 8.691(6) Å, b = 9.010(6) Å, c = 13.237(5) Å, β = 103.43(2)°, Z = 4, R = 0.0305; ttb·I2, a = 12.090(6) Å, b = 6.433(5) Å, c = 15.731(6) Å, β = 99.30(2)°, Z = 4, R = 0.0419). Both structures show that the thionic sulfur (in any case a CS3 group inserted in a ring) is bound almost collinearly with the diiodine molecule. The d(S−I) separations are 2.755(2) and 2.805(3) Å in the ptc·I2 and ttb·I2 adducts, respectively, while d(I−I) is practically the same (2.812(2) Å). An evident stereochemical difference is that the S−I−I moiety is nearly coplanar with the CS3 group in ptc·I2 while it is upright in ttb·I2. However, the feature is not expected to cause a major electronic difference. In order to reproduce the structural features, different ab initio approaches have been attempted, with the best results being obtained with the density functional method (DFT). Despite the S−I distances which are slightly longer than the experimental ones (by ca. 0.25 Å), the distribution of filled and empty frontier molecular orbitals (MOs) allows a good interpretation of the visible spectra. Also a rationalization of the σ electronic density distributed over the three centers S−I−I has been attempted by qualitative MO theory (EHMO method). Provided the good agreement with the higher level calculations, the perturbation theory arguments highlight the variable sp hybridization at the central iodine atom as the electronic factor of importance. The strength of the donor (D) affects significantly the redistribution of six electrons over four atomic orbitals, and the classic model is revised as a four-orbital/six-electron one. Thus, it is pointed out that a major four-electron repulsion is exerted over the D−I or the I−I linkages with major consequences for their respective lengths. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0020-1669 1520-510X |
DOI: | 10.1021/ic9901867 |