Microplastics in personal care products: Exploring perceptions of environmentalists, beauticians and students

• Published in: Marine pollution bulletin 2016-12, Vol.113 (1-2), p.454-460
• Main Authors: Anderson, A.G., Grose, J., Pahl, S., Thompson, R.C., Wyles, K.J.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Awareness; Consumer Behavior; Cosmetics - chemistry; Debris; England; Environmental Monitoring - methods; Focus Groups; Humans; Marine; Microparticles; Microplastic; Personal care products; Plastics - analysis; Plastics - chemistry; Public attitudes; Students; Surveys and Questionnaires; Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis; Water Pollutants, Chemical - chemistry
• ISSN: 0025-326X; 1879-3363
• DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.10.048

Microplastics enter the environment as a result of larger plastic items breaking down (‘secondary’) and from particles originally manufactured at that size (‘primary’). Personal care products are an important contributor of secondary microplastics (typically referred to as ‘microbeads’), for example in toothpaste, facial scrubs and soaps. Consumers play an important role in influencing the demand for these products and therefore any associated environmental consequences. Hence we need to understand public perceptions in order to help reduce emissions of microplastics. This study explored awareness of plastic microbeads in personal care products in three groups: environmental activists, trainee beauticians and university students in South West England. Focus groups were run, where participants were shown the quantity of microbeads found in individual high-street personal care products. Qualitative analysis showed that while the environmentalists were originally aware of the issue, it lacked visibility and immediacy for the beauticians and students. Yet when shown the amount of plastic in a range of familiar everyday personal care products, all participants expressed considerable surprise and concern at the quantities and potential impact. Regardless of any perceived level of harm in the environment, the consensus was that their use was unnatural and unnecessary. This research could inform future communications with the public and industry as well as policy initiatives to phase out the use of microbeads. •Focus group participants had generally limited awareness of microbead pollution.•Participants saw the use of microbeads in such products as unnatural and unnecessary.•Social media was seen as playing a key role in informing people about microplastics.