Sexual Orientation Self-Presentation Among Bisexual-Identified Women and Men: Patterns and Predictors

• Published in: Archives of sexual behavior 2017-07, Vol.46 (5), p.1465-1479
• Main Authors: Mohr, Jonathan J., Jackson, Skyler D., Sheets, Raymond L.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Behavioral Science and Psychology; Bisexuality; Bisexuality - psychology; Family; Female; Gays & lesbians; Gender Identity; Humans; Male; Mens health; Middle Aged; Original Paper; Psychology; Public Health; Sexual and Gender Minorities - psychology; Sexual Behavior; Sexual orientation; Sexual Partners; Social Identification; Social Sciences; Well being; Womens health
• ISSN: 0004-0002; 1573-2800
• DOI: 10.1007/s10508-016-0808-1

Writing on the experiences of bisexual-identified people has highlighted the potential complexity of the ongoing process of deciding when and how to present one’s sexual orientation identity to others (Rust, 2002 ). The two studies presented here were designed to contribute basic knowledge regarding self-presentation of sexual orientation among bisexual people. In Study 1, bisexual participants ( N  = 147) were less likely than their lesbian and gay (LG) peers ( N  = 191) to present their actual orientation to others, and more likely to present themselves as having a sexual orientation different from their actual orientation. These sexual orientation differences were explained by gender of romantic partner and uncertainty about one’s sexual orientation. Sexual orientation differences also emerged in links between self-presentation and outness level. For example, bisexual participants who presented themselves as LG had relatively high everyday outness levels; in contrast, LG participants who presented themselves as bisexual had relatively low everyday outness levels. In Study 2, 240 bisexual women and men indicated their levels of outness as a sexual minority person (potentially including identification as gay, lesbian, queer) and specifically as bisexual. Outness was higher with respect to status as a sexual minority compared to status as bisexual; the magnitude of this difference was predicted by gender of romantic partner and uncertainty about one’s sexual orientation. Moreover, even controlling for outness as a sexual minority person, well-being was predicted by outness as bisexual to family members.