Loading…

A comparison of three finite elements to solve the linear shallow water equations

The purpose of the present study is to select a convenient mixed finite element formulation for ocean modelling. The finite element equivalents of Arakawa's A-, B- and C-grids are investigated by using the linear shallow water equations. Numerical and analytical techniques are used to study the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ocean modelling (Oxford) 2003, Vol.5 (1), p.17-35
Main Authors: Hanert, E., Legat, V., Deleersnijder, E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The purpose of the present study is to select a convenient mixed finite element formulation for ocean modelling. The finite element equivalents of Arakawa's A-, B- and C-grids are investigated by using the linear shallow water equations. Numerical and analytical techniques are used to study the types of computational noise present in each element. It is shown that the P 1 P 1 and the P 1 P 0 element (the equivalents of the A- and B-grids respectively) allow the presence of spurious computational modes in the elevation field. For the P 1 P 1 element, these modes can be filtered out by adding a stabilizing term to the continuity equation. This method, although consistent, can lead to dissipative unphysical effects at the discrete level. The P 1 ⊥ P 0 element or low order Raviart–Thomas element (corresponding to the C-grid) is free of elevation noise and represents well inertia-gravity waves when the deformation radius is resolved but presents computational velocity modes. These modes are however filtered out in a more complex model in which the momentum diffusion term is not neglected.
ISSN:1463-5003
1463-5011
DOI:10.1016/S1463-5003(02)00012-4