Laparoscopic hysteropexy: 10 years’ experience

• Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 2017-08, Vol.28 (8), p.1241-1248
• Main Authors: Jefferis, Helen, Price, Natalia, Jackson, Simon
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Female; Gynecology; Humans; Hysterectomy; Hysteroscopy - adverse effects; Hysteroscopy - methods; Laparoscopy; Laparoscopy - adverse effects; Laparoscopy - methods; Length of Stay; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Middle Aged; Operative Time; Original Article; Patient satisfaction; Polypropylenes; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology; Postoperative Complications - etiology; Retrospective Studies; Surgery; Surgical Mesh; Treatment Outcome; Urology; Uterine Prolapse - surgery; Uterus - surgery
• ISSN: 0937-3462; 1433-3023
• DOI: 10.1007/s00192-016-3257-4

Introduction and hypothesis Uterine prolapse is common and has traditionally been treated by vaginal hysterectomy. Increasingly, women are seeking uterine-preserving alternatives. Laparoscopic hysteropexy offers resuspension of the uterus using polypropylene mesh. We report on 10 years’ experience with this technique. Methods All hysteropexy procedures in our unit since 2006 were reviewed. Primary outcome was safety of hysteropexy, as assessed by intraoperative and major postoperative complications. Secondary outcomes were measures of feasibility, including operating time, length of stay, conversion to alternative procedures, change in point C, patient satisfaction, and repeat apical prolapse surgery. Results Data were available for 507 women. Complications were rare (1.8%) with no evidence of any mesh exposure. Mean operating time was 62.5 min and median length of stay 2 nights. In 17 patients (3.4%), hysteropexy was abandoned. There was a mean change in point C of 7.9 cm and 93.8% of patients felt that their prolapse was “very much” or “much” better. Of these women, 2.8% have had repeat apical surgery. Conclusions To our knowledge, this is the largest series to date, describing 10 years’ experience with laparoscopic hysteropexy. The surgical technique appears to be safe, with low complication rates, which supports the choice of appropriately selected women to opt for uterine preservation surgery as an alternative to hysterectomy for the management of uterine prolapse.