A correlation analysis of metacarpal & phalangeal injury pattern from improvised explosive devices amongst armed force personnel

• Published in: Injury 2017-03, Vol.48 (3), p.738-744
• Main Authors: Staruch, R.M.T, Glass, G.E, Johnson, A, Hodson, J, Hettiaratchy, S.P, Kay, A.R, Chester, D
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Afghan Campaign 2001; Amputation; Amputation, Traumatic - epidemiology; Amputation, Traumatic - psychology; Amputation, Traumatic - surgery; Blast; Blast Injuries - epidemiology; Blast Injuries - physiopathology; Blast Injuries - psychology; Blast Injuries - surgery; Explosive Agents; Finger Phalanges - injuries; Fractures, Bone - epidemiology; Fractures, Bone - physiopathology; Fractures, Bone - psychology; Fractures, Bone - surgery; Hand Injuries - epidemiology; Hand Injuries - physiopathology; Hand Injuries - psychology; Hand Injuries - surgery; Humans; Improvised explosive device; Injury Severity Score; Life Change Events; Metacarpal Bones - injuries; Military; Military Medicine; Military Personnel; Orthopedics; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods; Trauma; United Kingdom - epidemiology; Upper limb
• ISSN: 0020-1383; 1879-0267
• DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.01.034

Abstract Injuries to the hand during military combat operations, particularly from improvised explosive devices (IEDs) have a significant impact on form, function, mental health and future employment but remain underreported amidst the life and limb-threatening emergencies that garner more attention. An understanding the patterns of hand injuries encountered from IEDs is crucial to optimizing reconstruction and rehabilitation. The aim of this study was to re-evaluate hand injury sustained from IED in order to understand the clinical burden for reconstruction and direct the focus for future hand protection. We identified 484 hand injuries in 380 patients sustained as a result of IEDs among military personnel service in Afghanistan between 2006 and 2013. 53% of all surviving military personnel injured by IEDs sustain injuries to the hand. Analysis of the 103 patients who sustained injury to the metacarpal, phalanges or digital amputation revealed that the middle and ring fingers are most commonly injured. Amputation to the ring finger is strongly associated with injury to the adjacent fingers and amputations to the middle, ring and little fingers concurrently is a commonly observed pattern. The proximal phalanges of the middle and ring fingers had a strong correlation for fracture together. These findings disprove the conventional belief in an ulnar focus of injury and support the quest for a development of combat hand protection that addresses the injury pattern seen.