Loading…

Efficacy and safety of low-dose capecitabine plus docetaxel versus single-agent docetaxel in patients with anthracycline-pretreated HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: results from the randomized phase III JO21095 trial

Purpose The randomized phase III JO21095 trial compared the efficacy and safety of low-dose capecitabine plus docetaxel combination therapy (XT) versus single-agent administration of docetaxel in anthracycline-pretreated HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. Methods Patients were randomized to eit...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Breast cancer research and treatment 2017-02, Vol.161 (3), p.473-482
Main Authors: Yamamoto, Daigo, Sato, Nobuaki, Rai, Yoshiaki, Yamamoto, Yutaka, Saito, Mitsue, Iwata, Hiroji, Masuda, Norikazu, Oura, Shoji, Watanabe, Junichiro, Hattori, Satoshi, Matsuura, Yoshimasa, Kuroi, Katsumasa
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purpose The randomized phase III JO21095 trial compared the efficacy and safety of low-dose capecitabine plus docetaxel combination therapy (XT) versus single-agent administration of docetaxel in anthracycline-pretreated HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. Methods Patients were randomized to either low-dose XT (capecitabine 825 mg/m 2 twice daily, days 1–14; docetaxel 60 mg/m 2 , day 1 every 3 weeks) or docetaxel (70 mg/m 2 , day 1 every 3 weeks). The primary objective was to demonstrate superior progression-free survival (PFS) with low-dose XT versus single-agent docetaxel. Overall survival (OS) and safety were secondary endpoints. Results In total, 162 patients were treated. Median PFS was 10.5 months with low-dose XT and 9.8 months with single-agent docetaxel (hazard ratio [HR] 0.62 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.40–0.97]; p  = 0.03). The OS HR was 0.89 (95% CI 0.52–1.53; p  = 0.68). Grade ≥3 treatment-related toxicities occurred in 74% of XT-treated patients and 76% of docetaxel-treated patients. The main differences in grade ≥3 treatment-related toxicities were hand-foot syndrome (7.3% of XT-treated patients vs 0% receiving docetaxel), fatigue/malaise (2.4 vs 10.0%), and peripheral edema (1.2 vs 7.5%). Dose modifications were required in 100% of low-dose XT and 49% of docetaxel patients. Toxicity-related treatment discontinuations occurred in 18 and 33%, respectively. Conclusion The improved PFS with low-dose XT versus docetaxel alone is consistent with higher-dose XT phase III experience, but the safety profile was more favorable and manageable.
ISSN:0167-6806
1573-7217
DOI:10.1007/s10549-016-4075-6