Sorption and transport of sulfonamides in soils amended with wheat straw-derived biochar: effects of water pH, coexistence copper ion, and dissolved organic matter

• Published in: Journal of soils and sediments 2017-03, Vol.17 (3), p.771-779
• Main Authors: Liu, Zhifu, Han, Yitong, Jing, Ming, Chen, Jiawei
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Activated carbon; Adsorption; Antibiotics; Bacterial diseases; Biochar for a Sustainable Environment; Charcoal; Contaminants; Copper; Desorption; Dissolved organic matter; Earth and Environmental Science; Environment; Environmental Physics; Fertilizers; Humic acids; Leaching; Soil adsorption; Soil Science & Conservation; Soils; Sorption; Triticum aestivum; Wheat straw
• ISSN: 1439-0108; 1614-7480
• DOI: 10.1007/s11368-015-1319-8

Purpose Sulfonamides are widely used for the prevention and treatment of bacterial infections, hard-degraded contaminants distributed in the environment if they are discharged into the soil and water. Biochar could probably influence the geochemical behavior of ionized antibiotics in the soils. Materials and methods To determine the sorption/desorption of three representative sulfonamides (SAs) in soils amended with biochar, we investigated the effects of water pH, Cu 2+ , and dissolved humic acid on the sorption of sulfamethoxazole (SMX), sulfamethazine (SMZ), and sulfadiazine (SD) onto two different soil samples (S1 pH = 5.13 and S2 pH = 7.33) amended with wheat straw-derived biochar (size 0.5∼0.6 mm). Results and discussion Batch experiments showed that the sorption/desorption isotherms of SAs on soil with/without biochar followed the Freundlich model. The biochar had a strong adsorption potential for SMX, SMZ, and SD both in S1 and S2 at low water pH. Except for SMX, the presence of Cu 2+ inhibited the sorption of SMZ and SD through competing hydrophobic adsorption region in soils. HA suppressed the sorption of three sulfonamides in soil S2 by electrostatic repulsion under alkaline condition. The soil leaching column experiments showed the SA transport in soils, and S1 and S2 amended with biochar (0.5 and 1.0 wt%) brought about 12–20 % increase in SMX, SMZ, and SD retention compared to the untreated soil. Conclusions The results indicated that the presence of biochar effectively mitigated the mobility of ionized antibiotics such as SMX, SMZ, and SD in soils, which helps us reconsider the potential risk of antibiotics in the environment.