Nonlinear advection‐aridity method for landscape evaporation and its application during the growing season in the southern Loess Plateau of the Yellow River basin

The advection‐aridity approach to estimate actual evaporation from natural land surfaces is one of the better known implementations of Bouchet's complementary principle. Detailed measurements at 2, 12, and 32 m above the ground surface during the growing seasons of 2004–2007 allowed validation...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Water resources research 2017-01, Vol.53 (1), p.270-282
Main Authors: Brutsaert, Wilfried, Li, Wei, Takahashi, Atsuhiro, Hiyama, Tetsuya, Zhang, Lu, Liu, Wenzhao
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Advection
Aridity
Blending effects
Calibration
Data processing
Evaporation
Evaporation rate
evapotranspiration
Fluxes
Freshwater
Growing season
Height
Landscape
Loess
Mathematical analysis
Methods
Nonlinearity
Parameters
Plateaus
River basins
Rivers
Scattering
Seasons
Terrain
Turbulence
Variability
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The advection‐aridity approach to estimate actual evaporation from natural land surfaces is one of the better known implementations of Bouchet's complementary principle. Detailed measurements at 2, 12, and 32 m above the ground surface during the growing seasons of 2004–2007 allowed validation of a generalized nonlinear form of this approach above the highly variable terrain in Changwu County in the southern Loess Plateau of the Yellow River basin in China. The obtained values of the parameters were found to lie well within the ranges to be expected on physical grounds or from previous measurements by different experimental means; calibration on the basis of any one year of data allowed predictions within roughly 5% on average. Relative to the corresponding observed turbulent vapor fluxes, the evaporation rates calculated with measurements at the highest level of 32 m displayed the least scatter but only slightly less than those calculated with measurements at the lower level of 12 m; however, those based on measurements at the lowest level of 2 m displayed considerably more scatter than those derived at the two higher levels. This is consistent with the existence of a blending height at higher elevations above the ground, where the effects of surface variability tend to fade away. Key Points Good agreement is obtained between the predicted values of evaporation and values measured using the eddy covariance technique The values of the four calibrated parameters are consistent with their values expected on physical grounds The method becomes more robust with height above the surface as the blending height is approached
ISSN:0043-1397
1944-7973
DOI:10.1002/2016WR019472