WHAT IS CIRCUMSTANTIAL ABOUT JUSTICE?

Does social justice lose all application in the (imaginary, of course) condition in which people are morally flawless? The answer, I will argue, is that it does not — justice might still have application. This is one lesson of my broader thesis in this paper, that there is a variety of conditions we...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Social philosophy & policy 2016, Vol.33 (1-2), p.292-311
Main Author: Estlund, David
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Morality
Norms
Rawls, John
Social justice
Social philosophy
Social policy
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Does social justice lose all application in the (imaginary, of course) condition in which people are morally flawless? The answer, I will argue, is that it does not — justice might still have application. This is one lesson of my broader thesis in this paper, that there is a variety of conditions we would all regard as highly idealistic and unrealistic which are, nevertheless, not beyond justice. The idea of “circumstances of justice” developed especially by Hume and Rawls may seem to point in a more realistic direction, but we can see that this is not so once we distinguish between conditions of need for norms of justice, conditions of their emergence, and conditions of applicability of the standard of justice. Justice, I argue, can have application even in conditions where no mechanism of justice is present or needed, such as the case of internalized motives of justice.
ISSN:0265-0525
1471-6437
DOI:10.1017/S0265052516000261